JUULING is this century’s big tobacco

The war against Big Tobacco was a pivotal time in our history opening up the floor to take a closer look at the vaping and JUULing industry. For over half a century, countless lawsuits have been filed against tobacco companies involving smokers and their families. However, as the years pass, the lawsuits are evolving to include vape and e-cigarette manufacturers. 

Smoking, evolved

The most notable offender would be the e-cigarette manufacturer, JUUL Labs. The creators of JUUL set out to create a product to help people quit smoking but along the way have attracted the attention of non-smoking minors through targeted advertising and fruity flavors. JUUL is currently under fire for deceptive marketing to minors, creating nicotine addiction and aiding in other illnesses. And like the Big Tobacco lawsuits, people are taking notice.

The facts on beating big tobacco

Early lawsuits

Once evidence emerged on the correlation of smoking to lung cancer in the 1950s, plaintiffs began suing cigarette manufacturers. Most of these smokers, already suffering from lung cancer, came to the stand with multiple theories:

• Faulty Production – That tobacco companies were failing to produce adequate products. 
• Product Liability – That tobacco companies were advertising a product that was unfit for use.
• Negligent Marketing – That tobacco companies failed to warn their consumers about the risk of smoking cigarettes.
• Fraud – That they were sold a product that manufacturers knew would negatively impact their health.
• Violation of Consumer Protection Statutes – That tobacco companies utilized unfair and deceptive business practices.  

However, the tobacco industry fought back with a confident rebuttal – taking on each lawsuit individually and refusing to settle out of court. They too had a few strategies of their own, stating that:

• Tobacco was not harmful to smokers 
• Other unrelated factors contribute to lung cancer
• Smokers accepted any risk when they decided to smoke

Surprisingly, these lawsuits favored the tobacco industry and a great number of plaintiffs were ultimately defeated. 

The Introduction of addiction

In the 1980s, smokers began a new wave of lawsuits that targeted the tobacco industry. The landmark case of the time was Cipollone v. Liggett, where the plaintiff alleged that cigarette manufacturers knowingly concealed the knowledge that smoking caused lung cancer and that cigarettes were addictive. This was the first time that addiction has ever been brought up in a tobacco lawsuit. Around the same time, others came forward with similar suits and were unsuccessful. 

In defending themselves, tobacco companies argued that smokers knowingly accepted the risks of cancer and other health problems upon their decision to smoke cigarettes. 

A slow victory

In the 1990s, people were having some level of succeeding against the tobacco industry lawsuits, primarily because internal documents were leaked revealing that manufacturers were aware of the addictive qualities of tobacco. 

It wasn’t until November 1998 that the attorney generals of 46 states along with four of the largest tobacco companies agreed to settle these cases. This is now referred to as the Master Settlement Agreement. A few of the key highlights of this agreement are that:

• Tobacco companies refrain from certain advertising tactics, in particular ad campaigns that marketed cigarettes to children.
• Tobacco companies pay annual sums of money to the states involved to compensate for the increase of healthcare costs related to smoking.
• The settlement creates and funds the National Public Education Foundation, dedicated to reducing youth smoking and diseases associated with smoking.
• Tobacco companies dissolve three of the biggest tobacco industry organizations.

The first huge win against Big Tobacco was in February 2020, when Philip Morris was ordered to pay $51.5 million to a California smoker with inoperable lung cancer. 

Around the same time, more than 40 states sued tobacco companies under antitrust and consumer protection laws. They stated that their products contributed to a significant increase in health problems that in turn became costly for public health systems. This time, Big Tobacco companies were no longer able to deny that the consumer was aware of the risks – a tactic that worked so well for them in the past. 

The People vs. JUUL

Ongoing lawsuits

Since their inception in 2015, JUUL Labs has quickly become the dominating force in the e-cigarette industry, leading the pack with 70% percent of the nearly $2 billion market. For over a decade, smokers around the globe have been jumping on the e-cig train believing that it’s the “healthier” option compared to cigarettes. 

In April 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered JUUL to provide them with documentation to help them understand the rates of youth use and the appeal their product has on minors. They also requested documents on JUUL’s design, safety research, and whether or not certain features were appealing to the younger age groups. 

The following month, multiple outlets began coming forward stating that JUULing has become an epidemic in high schools across the nation. The JUUL following was beginning to grow at an alarming rate, with teenagers coming to social media to brag about using the e-cigarette.

Adults began taking notice. JUUL has been under fire ever since for allegedly targeting their marketing efforts to the younger generation. With the growing trend of JUUL cigarettes, was this their intention all along? The investigation is just beginning.

Since the investigation began into the JUUL empire, there have been several measures implemented to keep the product out of the hands of minors, including changing the purchase age to 21, keeping the product off major sites like eBay and Amazon, and their standards for advertising.

How JUUL impacts minors

In addition to nearly double the nicotine and benzoic acid as other e-cigarettes, the consequences on the bodies of underage children are overwhelming. Smoking or vaping early in life kick starts the process of decreasing activity in the prefrontal cortex of the brain. This influences a person’s cognitive behavior, while increasing impulsivity and sensitivity to other drugs. It’s also known to hinder lung development if started during adolescence.

Researchers speculate that JUUL’s high-nicotine pods and marketing have been the culprit in undoing decades of anti-smoking gains. A recent federal survey shows 27.5 percent of high school students have used an e-cigarette in the past 30 days – a huge jump compared to last year’s 20.8 percent. According to the New England Journal of Medicine, one in nine high school seniors vape daily. 

Social changes

With the growing amount of publicity surrounding vape-related illnesses and death, people are taking a closer look at the consequences of e-smoking. Many states have increased the purchase age from 18 to 21, but there are other changes that are going to take some time. To view an updated list of social changes, click here.

How to file a claim against JUUL

If you believe that you or someone you know is a victim of JUUL products, please reach out to us. We are handling JUUL-related personal injury lawsuits at no cost to you. 

What could qualify you to file a claim:

• Addiction – with or without treatment.
• Any person, and especially high school or college students, who have been diagnosed with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumonia or an eosinophilic pneumonia that required medical treatment including hospitalization. JUUL smokers can quickly develop a significant pneumonia that may require ICU care including mechanical ventilation. 
• Any person who has developed COPD or advanced asthma after using JUUL products.
• Any person that has a heart attack (myocardial infarction) after using JUUL products.
• Eligible applicants should have never smoked traditional cigarettes prior to smoking JUUL.

If this sounds like you, please fill out an online claim or call 1-800-222-9657 for a free claim evaluation. A member of our staff will reach out to you to discuss your options. You may be entitled to monetary compensation.

Join the Fight Against JUUL by Partnering with Heninger Garrison Davis

Heninger Garrison Davis is Alabama’s most prolific civil litigation law firm based in Birmingham, AL. We focus on personal injury, business litigation, mass tort and class action cases. We possess the sophisticated legal skills, financial resources and multi-layered support needed to take on the world’s most powerful corporations. Our team works hard to cut through the complexity, get to the heart of the problem and win what matters the most.

How to Protect Your Home During the Holidays

The holidays bring many risksto your home and family, such as winter weather, fire hazards, and theft. Protecting your home during the holidays is, therefore, important. Thiscan be as simple as keeping an eye out for obvious risks, such as icy walkways, taking steps to disguise being away from home, or eliminating or minimizing the risk of fire hazards.

By taking preventative measures to protect your home and those inside it, you will reduce the likelihoodof making insurance claims for losses or being exposed to liability for injuries to visitors.

Protect Your Home from Theft

Thieves or burglars use various techniques to identify target-rich environments. For example, they can peek through your windows or rummage through your trash to determine the value of your Christmas gifts. To reduce the risk of giving thieves a reason to target your home, you can shred store receipts and credit card bills, wait until garbage day to throw out the packaging for your gifts, and keep gifts away from your ground-level windows.

More sophisticated techniques employed by thieves include scouting your home via social media. Thieves will look for posts about travel plans and gifts to assess the risks and rewards of breaking into your home. Resisting the temptation to post about travel and gifts or delaying those posts until after the holidays can thwart attempts to electronically case your home.

When you do travel, you may want to invest in some anti-theft countermeasures such as home alarm systems and electric light timers. If your lights are on and your front window has security stickers of an alarm company, would-be thieves will think twice before breaking in.

Protect Your Home from Winter Hazards

Winter itself can be hazardous to your safety and those of your family, guests, and even your pets. Prepare for emergencies by assembling a disaster kit with a few days of supplies, including food, water, flashlights, and batteries. Remember to address everyone’s needs with your disaster kit by including diapers, pet food, and prescription medications for those who might need them.

Inspecting your home and yard periodically can also protect your home. Overflowing rain gutters can create puddles that freeze on your walkways and driveways. Similarly, tree branches that have been damaged by wind, snow, or freezing rain can break and strike your home, car, or unsuspecting visitors.

Under premises liability principles, you are required to take reasonable steps to discover any hazards and either warn guests or eliminate the hazard. Making a quick walkthrough of your property after a powerful storm can show that you acted reasonably if a hazard originating on your premises causes property damage or personal injury.

Protect Your Home from Fire

According to the National Fire Protection Association, fires originating from Christmas trees and holiday decorationsbetween 2013 and 2017resulted in about six deaths and 50 injuries annually. These fires also caused about $22 million per year in property damage.

To protect your home from fire, invest in smoke alarms and replace the batteries every six months. Moreover, purchase your Christmas tree in December rather than November to ensure that it stays fresh. Inspect your holiday light strands for any worn or broken wires and throw them away when the wires become exposed. Finally, extinguish open flames and candles when you are not at home.

How to Protect Your Home and Yourself

Although financial exposure to many of these hazards can be mitigated through home insurance, once deductibles are considered, prevention is often much less costly than being reimbursed for the loss. Worse yet, insurance claims for personal property may be subject to claim limits, particularly if you lack records to prove the value of the property. Finally, claims against your home insurance can cause your insurance premium rates to skyrocket.

Additionally, it’s worth repeating that you should take reasonable steps to protect your home against theft, fire, and weather-related hazards. This will mitigate the risk that your home will suffer a casualty. And if a dispute were to arise between you and your insurance company or a guest, your reasonable actions will help you to avoid bearing the blame for any personal injury or property damage.

If you have suffered a loss and have not been fully compensated by your insurance company, have been accused of negligence for an injury that occurred on your property, or suffered an injury on someone else’s property, you are welcome to contact us at Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC today to discuss your situation.

When is a Prescription Drug Manufacturer Responsible for Death or Injury?

According to WebMD, as of 2016, approximately 4.5 billion prescriptions are filled annually in the U.S. Likewise, the same source claims that as many as 1.3 million people go to the emergency room each year as a result of adverse reactions. As many as 124,000 people die each year from negative medication reactions, contraindications, and other drug-related problems. With so many injuries and deaths, it may seem like prescription medications are simply dangerous. How do you know when a drug manufacturer is to blame for making a bad drug or dangerous medication that caused harm to the public?

At Heninger Garrison Davis, we are constantly staying up-to-date on the latest in pharmaceutical laws and regulations. It is our goal to make sure all Americans are protected from unscrupulous drug manufacturers who rush products to market without taking the necessary legal precautions.

Recent Drug Lawsuits

 

You have probably heard of lawsuits against major drug companies in recent years. Maybe you even know someone who was injured or killed by a bad drug that had terrible adverse effects. Here are just a few of the recent drugs that have been involved in major litigation over dangerous and deadly effects:

• Actos
• Invokana
• Talcum Powder
• Taxotere
• Xarelto/Pradaxa
• Zofran

What Makes a Bad Drug Case?

 

Like all forms of personal injury, there are basic legal elements that must be proven in order to recover compensation for harm. In car accidents or slip and fall cases, the elements are largely the same as when suing a major drug manufacturer for developing a dangerous medication. However, the evidence and procedures necessary for success are extremely different and usually much more complex in a pharmaceutical injury case. In general, you must prove each of the following:

 

• That the company owed you (the general public) a specific duty
• That the company breached or violated that duty in some way
• That as a direct result of the company breaching its duties, you suffered an injury
• Your injuries resulted in losses, monetary or otherwise

 

Now, these are just the legal elements to prove. There are many things that must be shown in order to prove each. For instance, a drug manufacturer may ignore significant research that shows a risk that its drug could cause ovarian cysts and conceal this information from FDA inspections or skew data to make it look like a lower risk than what it really is. By doing this, it could mean that a dangerous medication hits the market and physicians, as well as patients, may not realize the true risks and dangers associated with taking the medication. While this is just one hypothetical example, scenarios like this happen all the time.

 

Why Would Drug Manufacturers Take Such Huge Risks?

 

Large pharmaceutical companies know that even if they get sued and lose significant verdicts, it is still more profitable to conceal evidence, hide research, and rush dangerous products to market. The profit incentive is just too enormous. Therefore, many drug manufacturers are willing to accept that their products are killing tens of thousands of innocent people because ultimately it makes them a lot of money.

 

But Don’t All Drugs Have Warnings?

 

Yes, but are they accurate and consistent? For many defective drugs, it is not so much the fact that a person was injured due to side effects, but rather, it is the fact that the side effects were known but never disclosed. If you were told that an anxiety medication had a 15% chance of causing minor abdominal bleeding, you may take that calculated risk. But if you were told that it had a 15% chance of causing fatal abdominal tumors, chances are you would be discussing alternative medications with your doctor.

 

Therefore, a “defective drug” lawsuit is not just about the fact that a drug was harmful to a group of people. A defective drug lawsuit is about holding companies accountable for depriving the general public of the information they needed to make informed choices about their own healthcare. Victims and their families are often left with terrible life-altering conditions to endure, including:

 

• Enormous medical expenses
• Pain and agony
• Emotional distress
• Repeated and painful medical procedures and surgeries
• Loss of income
• Permanent disabilities, surgical scars and disabilities

 

How are Defective Drug Cases Settled?

 

Because victims often live all over the country and may have claims against a drug manufacturer located in a different state, many cases are handled through something known as multi-district litigation (MDL). This is when various law firms in different parts of the company work together to represent clients in federal court cases involving claims brought in multiple federal jurisdictions.

 

At Heninger Garrison Davis, our attorneys are experienced with the process and procedure of taking cases before state and federal courts to obtain justice. If you need help fighting for compensation after suffering injuries due to a defective medication, or if you have lost a loved one due to a bad drug, call our firm today to schedule a completely free initial case evaluation with one of our experienced attorneys.

Understanding the Differences Between Car Accidents and Trucking Accidents

by HGD Staff

 Victims of motor vehicle crashes are often dismayed when they receive a denial letter from an insurance company. Worse yet, many victims are even denied by their own insurance companies after years of dutifully paying their insurance premiums. If this is happening to you, or if you have suffered injuries in a motor vehicle crash, you should not

put up with the unfair insurance tactics.

Trust the attorneys of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC. With offices in New York, New Jersey, Alabama and Georgia, we have the resources and experience to tackle any size case. For those who have been hurt in accidents involving semi tractor-trailers and other large commercial vehicles, it is extremely important to understand the key differences between these large scale claims and your usual car accidents.

Severe Injuries

 

Perhaps the most notable distinction between a typical car wreck and a trucking accident is the extent of the injuries. Motor vehicle crashes in general have been increasing in frequency and are quickly approaching the top 10 leading causes of death among all Americans. As of 2015, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that they ranked 13th among all causes of death but ranked seventh among younger Americans.

Over 36,000 people die in motor vehicle crashes each year, of which approximately 4,000 are due to large truck accidents. In 2016, there were 3,986 people killed by large truck collisions, according to the Insurance Information Institute. While trucking collisions make up a small percentage of the total accidents that occur, they result in a disproportionate percentage of the fatal crashes. Therefore, there are rarely “minor” injuries in truck collisions.

Different Defendants

 

A trucking accident will involve numerous potential defendants who may have conflicting interests in the case. In a typical two-car collision, both parties are regular people. They each may have a car insurance policy, they both have roughly the same resources and access to investigative tools. Both will contact their insurance companies, and they may each contact an attorney.

When a trucking company is involved, there may be numerous parties potentially responsible for causing the crash. These may include:

• Lumpers (people the driver hired to load the truck)
• Factories or warehouses where the truck was loaded improperly
• Mechanics who failed to properly fix defective equipment
• Truck or trailer manufacturers who incorrectly designed equipment
• The truck driver
• The trucking company
• Leasing company that supplied a truck or trailer

Complicated Evidence

 

In addition to all the possible parties at fault in causing the crash, there may also be more complicated evidence. In a typical car accident, there is a crash report, maybe some witness statements and photographs, and perhaps some data from the car’s crash recorder. In a trucking case, there can be a lot more information available, and it can be difficult to obtain unless you know where to look.

• Electronic crash data recorder (black box)
• Log books
• GPS data
• Qualcomm data
• Cell phone records
• Maintenance logs
• Bills of lading and shipping records
• Witness statements

 

Likewise, federal motor carrier standards apply to most interstate hauling companies, so there are many cases in which a driver was in violation of the federal standards. These regulations can be a bit complicated unless you are familiar with them.

Fast Action Required

 

Finally, you cannot take your time investigating a truck accident. Trucking companies often immediately launch an investigation. There have been cases in which the company had investigators and engineers on-site at the scene of the crash, already photographing damage, talking to police and witnesses, and trying to clean up debris. This is going on while you, as the injured person, are on your way to the hospital. Therefore, trucking companies already have a distinct advantage.

 

This is why it is important to work with skilled attorneys who can immediately begin investigating and working to preserve crucial evidence before it is destroyed or altered.

 

 

After a collision with a commercial vehicle, your first step should be to get emergency medical attention right away. Go straight to the hospital and let doctors evaluate your injuries. If you are able, contact a loved one and have them call an attorney right away. The attorney can begin quickly moving to gather evidence and preserve your rights. Once your injuries are stabilized, you will need to follow up on your medical care and do as your doctor recommends.

 

The earlier an attorney is involved, the better your chances of obtaining monetary compensation for your injuries. If you or a loved one have been hurt in a trucking accident, call Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC today. We offer private free consultations, and there is never any risk for calling because we do not get paid unless you do.

 

 

Suing for Verbal or Emotional Abuse in a Nursing Home

By HGD Staff

When most people think of nursing home abuse, they think of obvious and catastrophic physical injuries. In reality, there are a lot of different ways that a vulnerable senior living in a nursing home facility can be subjected to abuse. One of the most insidious and frightening ways that abusers can hurt residents is through verbal and emotional abuse.

So, what makes verbal and emotional abuse so terrifying and serious? In short, it is because the victim is trapped in an institutional setting, where the abuser may be their sole source of food, medical care, and even the source of medications necessary for survival. According to a 2000 report, 95% of nursing home residents polled stated that they had either been abused or witnessed abuse.

At Heninger, Garrison & Davis, LLC, our nursing home abuse lawyers are ready to fight to make sure vulnerable seniors are protected. If you believe a loved one is being abused in a nursing home, or you have lost a loved one due to poor medical care or neglect, you have the right to seek compensation for the injuries and loss. Call us today to speak with someone free of charge.

What is Verbal and Emotional Abuse?

Verbal abuse can take many forms, but at its core, it is using threats, hate speech, insults or ridicule in order to embarrass, shame, intimidate, or control another person. Here are a few common examples:

• A staff member gets frustrated at how frequently a senior needs toileting assistance and begins verbally insulting or making fun of the resident
• Out of frustration or just pure cruelty, a nurse threatens to withhold medications just to scare a resident
• A cleaning person uses racial slurs toward an elderly resident

While these are just a few examples, rest assured they have happened. Sadly, it can be difficult to identify the signs of verbal and emotional abuse.

A Nursing Home is Meant to be the Resident’s Home

When it comes to elderly nursing home residents, it is critical to understand that a nursing home is not the same as a hospital. It is called a nursing “home” for a reason. It is not a healthcare facility where the individual will spend a day or two then head home. Instead, nursing homes are also aptly called “long-term skilled nursing” facilities. A person goes to a skilled nursing facility for long-term rehabilitation or possibly a final admission during the end of life. There is an expectation that the facility – in particular the resident’s room – will be treated as a private space akin to a home. In fact, it is more than an expectation; federal law guarantees it.

Nursing Home Resident Rights

Under federal regulations, a resident has a right to privacy in his or her own room and the right to a home-like environment. Many states add additional rights in order to guarantee that a mistreated resident will have adequate legal options if their rights under the law are violated.

How to Recognize the Signs of Verbal and Emotional Abuse

A senior living with constant abuse may act in ways that do not always make sense at first. Here are a few major red flags to watch for:

• Some residents become withdrawn or tell family members not to visit. This can seem counterintuitive because one would expect a resident to want protection and comfort from loved ones. However, feelings of shame, frailty, and embarrassment can cause a senior to avoid contact with loved ones. Likewise, if staff are threatening the senior, he or she may simply seek to avoid situations that seems suspicious to the staff.
• Refusing Food or Medicine. Another strange but common warning sign is a physical manifestation of withdrawal. In addition to avoiding loved ones, the senior may in fact choose to stop medical care or cease eating, socializing, or rehabilitation efforts. In some cases, this is a deliberate form of suicide. In other instances, it is an unconscious attempt to remove the painful stimuli by simply not asking for things. In this resident’s mind, if he or she does not ask for things, the staff will have no reason to continue the abuse.
• Abnormal Behavior Around Certain Staff. If your loved one becomes guarded or visibly disturbed when a specific staff member is around, this could be a sign of abuse.

What to do About Abuse

Ultimately, you have the power to put an end to abuse. If you suspect abuse, you should report it to your state’s elder abuse hotline. It must be posted in the facility. You can report by phone or via e-mail and letter. Here are a few for your reference:

 

New York       Abuse Hotline             (888) 201-4563           (available 24/7)

 

New Jersey   Abuse Hotline               (800) 792-9770           (available 24/7)

 

Georgia           Abuse Hotline             (866) 55-AGING        (M-F 8:00am – 5:00pm)

 

Alabama          Abuse Hotline             (800) 356-9596           (M-F 8:00am – 5:00pm)

Next, call Heninger Garrison Davis to speak with an attorney for free. We can help you better understand your rights and options. In many cases, an abused senior may have a right to compensation. If your loved one has died, and you suspect abuse may have played a role, then his or her estate may be entitled to compensation, as well. Give us a call to discuss your concerns today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recovering Monetary Compensation for Childhood Sexual Abuse

by HGD Staff

 In the wake of yet more sex abuse discoveries, the Catholic Church continues to struggle with a decades-long image problem. Just recently, it was revealed that the identities of more than 500 priests in Illinois were kept hidden from authorities, even after credible allegations of sexual abuse were brought against them. While terrible, stories like these are not unique to the Catholic Church. From major religions to smaller sectarian organizations, childhood sexual abuse has become a serious problem for many religious groups around the world. Many non-religious institutions are coming under fire, as well, as more victims speak out.

At Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, our experienced personal injury attorneys are here to help those who are injured by others. While taking on large institutions can often be quite challenging, our attorneys have the skills and real life experience to pursue compensation for cases big and small.

Why Pursue an Injury Claim Against a Sexual Abuser?

For those who suffer from lifelong emotional and mental scars from child abuse, it can seem as though there is no solution, no answer that can undo the past. Indeed, childhood sexual abuse can mean a lifetime of medical and psychiatric needs, and it can damage relationships and lead to higher than usual suicide rates. For these reasons, it is important for victims to speak out and take action. As some recent cases have proven, courts are now more willing than ever to impose civil damages for sexual abuse, even years after an offense.

Common Childhood Sexual Abuse Injuries

For children who are abused by adults, the pain can last the rest of their lives. However, the injuries are often elusive and invisible, so it can be difficult to come forward and discuss the injury. For instance, sexual abuse can lead to:

• Sexually transmitted diseases
• Unwanted pregnancy
• Physical injuries
• Permanent scars
• Emotional distress
• Psychological injuries
• Depression
• Personality disorders
• Eating disorders
• Higher-than-usual rates of suicide and self-abuse
• Drug and alcohol addiction
• Failed relationships
• Risk-seeking behaviors
• Increased chance of being involved in a violent or abusive relationship

How Long Do You Have to Take Action?

It is important to distinguish between criminal and civil penalties. For instance, in New York, there is no statute of limitations for prosecuting a person for rape. But many forms of childhood sexual abuse do not fit the definition of rape, and may only be subject to prosecution up to two or three years after a child reaches adulthood.

The statutes of limitations for bringing a civil claim, however, are different. Although the deadline may have long passed to pursuing a criminal action, some forms of sexual abuse may be subject to civil liability for much longer, especially where a defendant intentionally acted to conceal the evidence or hide the wrongdoing. This is where some institutions have gotten into serious trouble and been forced to pay large settlements.

Because the rules can be fact-specific, if you were abused as a child and suspect a religious organization, school, or other institution acted to cover up the evidence, you should discuss the matter with an attorney as soon as possible. Likewise, if you know a child or teenager who has been abused by an adult teacher, religious leader, or some other individual in a position of trust, it is important for the child to get counseling and assistance early, as it can have a demonstrable impact on a victim’s ability to heal.

Compensation Available for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors

Because sexual abuse is both a crime and an intentional wrongful act, a victim may be entitled to financial compensation. Many victims, unfortunately, fear that receiving money from an abuser or their organization would be pointless, but the fact is that monetary compensation can help to cover the costs of medical and psychiatric treatment, counseling, and similar care. It can also help to offset much of the damage done by the abuse, such as years of limited employment, damaged relationships, and other consequences.

Getting Compassionate Legal Advice

 When you call and speak with an attorney from Heninger Garrison Davis it is important to understand that we are not going to rush or try to tell you what to do. That is not our place. Instead, our goal is to help injury victims of all kinds better understand their options. If a large and powerful organization, religion, employer, sports program, or other institution played a role in a child’s sexual abuse or a later cover-up, there may be significant compensation available. Our attorneys can help to assess your case and let you know your options. Give us a call today.

 

Official 2003 Report Predicted Rapid Growth on I-10 Corridor

by HGD Staff

 As far back as 2003, a multi-state commission was developed to investigate and research the likely growth and expansion of Interstate-10 from coast to coast. Among those in the committee were major representatives and engineers from each state affected by I-10, including our very own Don Vaughn, a long-time transportation engineer for the Alabama Department of Transportation for more than 46 years. The committee released a detailed report on the anticipated growth of the I-10 freight corridor in years to come.

According to the report, commercial truck traffic would grow at roughly twice the pace of regular automobile traffic along the freight corridor. Likewise, the report indicated that this would take place by 2025, creating worse conditions for the motoring public. As we approach this date in the next few years, it is worth taking a moment to note the realities of the I-10 freight corridor in Alabama at present, and how it is impacting the motoring public today.

Interstate 10 in Alabama

Among all the states impacted by the 2003 report, Alabama has the least number of I-10 highway miles traveling through it, coming in at just 66 miles of road, compared to Texas with 877 miles and Florida with 362 miles approximately. Therefore, at first blush one may think that Alabama may not feel the effects of shipping growth along the corridor. However, this would be wrong.

Trucking Accidents Along the Alabama Freight Corridor on I-10

In just our state’s small 66-mile stretch of Interstate-10, trucking accidents and fatalities are a common occurrence. Just recently, a major trucking company was involved in a collision on I-10, leaving at least one person seriously injured.

Of course, this comes just a few months after a major accident along the same road in August of 2018, where a semi-truck overturned spilling hazardous chemicals and blocked all lanes of travel. The cause of that crash appeared to be the driver losing control due to unlevel pavement.

These types of scenarios are far too common across the State of Alabama. Each year, hundreds of people are seriously injured or killed in semi tractor-trailer collisions in Alabama, many of them along the I-10 corridor. For a tiny 66-mile stretch of road, it claims many lives.

Typical Reasons for Commercial Vehicle Crashes

While police reports and state and federal crash data tend to paint a picture that is a bit blurry regarding true causes, the truth is that many of these collisions are preventable with appropriate training and a bit of extra caution. A good number of these crashes are caused by simple truck driver error, while others may be due to more hidden and subtle causes. Here are some typical examples:

• Asleep at the wheel crashes: Truck drivers are bound by specific rules, including federal hours of service regulations that dictate how many hours of downtime they require in between shifts and how many hours they can work and drive at a time without a break. Since most professional drivers are paid by the mile (not by the hour), there is a strong incentive to break the rules and operate past their legal limits.
• Alcohol, drugs, and medications: While truck drivers are required to pass a Department of Transportation physical assessment to get and keep their CDL, this does not stop drivers from playing the system. Many drivers struggle with sleep apnea, obesity, heart problems, and other conditions that require medication. A driver may take medications that cause drowsiness or concentration problems. They can stop taking the medication a few days or weeks before a physical, not report it, and continue taking it a day later. Obviously illegal narcotics and alcohol abuse are big problems too.
• Poor training: Generally, the public would be horrified if they saw the training that some truck drivers receive before taking the wheel of an 80,000-pound tractor-trailer combination vehicle full of hazardous chemicals. Some truck driving schools rush people through and even “coax” them through state testing Other schools are little more than a place to get some “road time” before hitting the highway. This leaves a massive gap in knowledge and skill.

Compensation for Trucking Accidents in Alabama

If you or a loved one have been injured in a truck accident along the I-10 corridor or anywhere else in Alabama, you can not afford to take chances on your medical care and recovery. Let Heninger Garrison & Davis, LLC help you fight for the compensation that you and your family deserve. And if you have lost a loved one in a tragic trucking fatality, give us a call right away so we can initiate a swift investigation into the circumstances of the crash before crucial evidence is forever lost.

 

Why Whiplash is More Serious Than You May Think

by HGD Staff

We have all seen those cheesy comedies in which someone pretends to be injured by wearing a “C-collar” to court. Maybe you have heard stories about people claiming whiplash after a car accident, and it conjures up images of a malingerer or scam artist trying to get quick cash from a lawsuit. Well, it is time to do away with those unfortunate images

forever. While yes, there will always be a small portion of the population who attempts to manipulate the system to their own benefit, the truth is that whiplash is a serious injury. People who suffer from whiplash injuries can tell you just how real and unpleasant they are.

The attorneys of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC are here to help. We understand that each injury is just as unique as the person suffering through it. Whiplash injuries are no different. No matter what type of injury you have, if someone else caused it, then it is only fair that they make it right. Let us help you today.

What is Whiplash?

Whiplash is actually not a medical diagnosis, nor is it a medical or legal term. It is just a nickname for a wide range of conditions that are caused by a single type of event. Any time

the head is violently thrust back and forth on the neck, it can lead to muscle, ligament, and other soft tissue injuries to the neck and upper back. To accurately describe whiplash, it is important to consider how the biomechanics of the neck and upper back actually work.

Neck and Back Anatomy

The cervical spine is comprised of seven cervical vertebrae, six cervical discs (in between the vertebrae) and eight nerves. At the base of the seventh vertebrae, the cervical neck connects to the thoracic spine. Often called the “cervicothoracic junction,” this is where the C8 vertebral nerve lies. When the neck moves back and forth rapidly and with a lot of force, several things can happen:

• Muscle Strain: All of the muscle fibers throughout the shoulders, neck and upper thoracic spine can be injured, leading to bruising, swelling, and inflammation. This can cause painful aggravation and irritation and can make people feel as though their neck and shoulders are “locked.”
• Disc Injuries: In severe cases, the discs that cushion the vertebrae can be ruptured, causing them to leak the gel-like fluid inside them. This can lead to rubbing and nerve impingement.

Even where discs are intact and not ruptured, it is common for the muscle strain associated with whiplash to last for several months. The worst part is that it can be deceiving in the beginning. Here is why symptoms are delayed.

Whiplash is a Tricky Condition

Whiplash, unlike many acute injuries, does not always manifest right away. Think of the last time you went to a gym or tried to do something physical after not using those muscles for a long time. Maybe you got a wild idea to go try bench pressing after years of not doing it. Or, maybe you started jogging again. You may recall that you felt okay for the first

day. Maybe even the second day was not too bad. But about two days after exercising, you probably noticed a lot of soreness and pain in your muscles. This is because muscles do not hurt that much when they are being pulled and stretched. They really hurt when they are healing and rebuilding.

In this same way, many whiplash victims do not notice the inflammation and pain of their injuries until weeks after the accident. Of course, if you wait that long to get medical help, two things will happen:

• You will likely face an insurance denial. Insurance companies love to tell people they waited too long to get care. They know that they will probably be able to convince a jury that you were not hurt badly if you waited two weeks or longer to get care. While there are sometimes ways that an experienced attorney can help overcome these arguments, it is much better if you just go to the hospital for treatment.
• You will hurt worse. The real problem, of course, is that you will suffer more. The earlier you can begin actively treating the problem with physical therapy, chiropractic care, cold and hot therapies, and other options, the sooner you will recover and the sooner you will start feeling better.

 If you and your loved ones are suffering after an auto accident in Alabama, call Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC today.

 

HGD’s Anna Carroll Elected Vice President for Young Lawyers Section

HGD congratulates Anna Carroll who was recently elected to serve as Vice President of Public Service on the Young Lawyers Executive Board for the Birmingham Bar Association. She has served as an at large member of the Executive Committee for the past two years and is excited to step into a leadership position. As VP of Public Service, she will oversee the YLS’s fundraising and community service efforts.

 

 

Judge Chris McCool is Featured Speaker at HGD’s Winter CLE

Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Judge J. Chris McCool is the featured guest speaker for HGD’s annual winter CLE for members of the Alabama Association for Justice Emerging Leaders and members of the Magic City Bar Association on Thursday, December 12. Judge McCool’s presentation is titled  “A Grab-Bag of Practical Issues for Lawyers in the Trenches.”

McCool was the longtime district attorney for three counties in West Alabama before being elected to the state’s second-highest criminal court in November, 2018. McCool served as the district attorney for the 24th Judicial Circuit, which includes Fayette, Lamar and Pickens counties, since July 2001.

The CLE will be held in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room at the Birmingham HGD office. A holiday reception will follow the CLE.

Erik Heninger Guest Speaker for Barrister’s CLE

HGD’s Erik Heninger is a featured speaker for the Barristers Educational Services CLE on “Recent Developments in Alabama Law” in Birmingham on December 10. The topics include:

• Discussion of new cases, new statutes, & emerging trends of the past 12 months in 13 different areas of law
• Torts, insurance, civil procedure, family law, business law, federal developments, criminal law, ethics, and much more

Barristers Educational Services has been a leading innovator in continuing legal education for over 25 years. Known for its lively and uniquely interesting style of CLE, Barristers was founded in 1994 by William R. Newman, an attorney and professor with many years of “real-world” law practice experience.

Erik is a member of the State Bars of Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi and maintains a consistent presence in each state. The majority of his practice is devoted to representing individuals and businesses in civil litigation. While civil litigation is the vehicle through which he works, Erik’s passion is helping people who suffer from catastrophic injuries such as severe brain and spine damage.

He is very active in the American Association of Justice (AAJ) where he teaches trial advocacy and litigation techniques to other lawyers across the country. These trial colleges allow Erik to offer his knowledge and experience and also expose him to innovative ideas being used by other lawyers. Erik also focuses on the State of Alabama through his involvement with the Alabama Association of Justice (ALAJ), serving as an Officer since 2017.

Currently, Erik represents the 10th Judicial Circuit (Birmingham) as an elected member of the Board of Bar Commissioners for the Alabama State Bar. As part of his Commissioner responsibilities, Erik sits on the Alabama State Bar Character & Fitness Committee and the Disciplinary Rules & Enforcement Committee. Finally, he has been a member of the Birmingham Bar Executive Committee since 2016. Erik is “AV Preeminent” Rated by Martindale-Hubbell – the highest possible distinction conferred by both professional peers and judges. In 2013, he was inducted as a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), an invitation only organization committed to preserving the right to trial by jury.

Your Voice Against JUUL: Getting Involved

JUUL has been the target of many recent, consumer-facing legal battles claiming that JUUL manufacturers have been deceptively marketing their nicotine-packed e-cigarettes to minors. With the increasing numbers of JUUL-related deaths and injuries, consumers are beginning to take a stand. 

Taking on big names like JUUL isn’t an easy feat. And like solving most problems, the first step is coming forward. However, there are reasons some victims are hesitant to get involved with JUUL litigation. 

Fear of striking out with JUUL litigation

For most people, seeking legal help is often the last resort. This fear is rooted in the idea that legal battles are a long, tedious and expensive process. Some people take a step back to avoid the expenses associated with getting legal help. 

Fact or fiction about JUUL litigation

Common misconceptions about legal claims prevent a lot of people from pursuing justice. With our JUUL class action lawsuit, you won’t have to worry about a thing. Let us help you navigate the process of filing a claim while debunking these common myths.

Fear of expensive fees and painfully long processes

While most law firms ask for costly up-front fees, Heninger Garrison Davis does not. In order to achieve the sort of change we’re looking to accomplish, we need your help by telling us about your JUUL experience. 

And after filing an online or phone claim, you’ll be contacted by a member of our staff to document important information about your case. We’ll ask such questions as to when you started smoking JUUL, how you obtained the device, and the side effects you’ve experienced due to JUUL. So the process is actually quite simple and not time-consuming at all.

Our goal is to make this process as smooth as possible. By filing a claim with us, all we’ll need is a few hours of your time. Most of the cases are completed without the need for face to face meetings. If there is a need to meet in person, we’ll come to you.

Fear of losing

“Don’t let the fear of striking out keep you from playing the game!” This popular quote sums up your experience with filing a claim against JUUL. We need your voice in order to prevent JUUL Labs from kickstarting addiction and bodily harm to minors across the nation. You will not be charged with hidden fees or follow up appointments.  

JUUL: harmful side effects and intentional youth targeting

Like many social movements, it takes a little bravery and a lot of confidence. There are more than enough reasons to join the thousands of people making their voice count. JUUL Labs produces a product that causes real harm and has chosen the youth marketplace to target. Here are just a few examples of how young people can be affected by JUUL, and deceptive advertising campaigns they employ: 

Discreet design

JUUL takes advantage of its slim design and ease of use to make vaping discreet. Unlike other vape devices, no prior experience or complicated instructions are needed. There aren’t any buttons or settings to adjust – just inhale.

Misleading marketing

JUUL Labs has utilized brightly-colored ads, young models and fruity flavors to reach out directly to young people. Flavors like mango, creme, fruit and cucumber appeal to young smokers, especially the ones who have never smoked a traditional cigarette. 

Harmful chemicals

JUUL products contain a significantly higher dosage of nicotine and benzoic acid compared to traditional cigarettes. Research indicates that 1 JUUL pod is equal to 1 pack of cigarettes. While most e-cigarette brands contain 2.4 percent nicotine, JUUL contains 5 percent. Benzoic acid is a substance known for causing coughs, sore throat, abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting, if exposure is constant. A typical amount of benzoic acid in e-cigarettes would be 0.2 to 2 mg/mL; JUUL contains 44.8 mg/mL. 

While it’s easy to convince a smoker that vaping is the “healthier” option, a 2017 study found that non-smoking adults were four times more likely to start smoking traditional cigarettes after only 18 months of vaping, which includes “JUULing.”

Long-term consequences

Smoking at an early age reduces the activity in the prefrontal cortex of the brain. This area is critical in influencing a person’s cognitive behavior and decision making while leading to increased sensitivity to other drugs and greater impulsivity. Along with brain function, it’s also proven to hinder lung development if started in adolescence.

How to file a free claim against JUUL

If you believe that you or someone you know is a victim of JUUL products, please reach out to us. We are handling JUUL-related personal injury lawsuits at no cost to you. 

What could qualify you to file a claim:

• Addiction – with or without treatment.
• Any person, and especially high school or college students, who have been diagnosed with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, pneumonia or an eosinophilic pneumonia that required medical treatment including hospitalization. JUUL smokers can quickly develop significant pneumonia that may require ICU care including mechanical ventilation. 
• Any person who has developed COPD or advanced asthma after using JUUL products.
• Any person that has a heart attack (myocardial infarction) after using JUUL products.
• Eligible applicants should have never smoked traditional cigarettes prior to smoking JUUL.

If this sounds like you, please fill out an online claim or call 1-800-222-9657 for a free claim evaluation. A member of our staff will reach out to you to discuss your options. You may be entitled to monetary compensation.

Partner with Heninger Garrison Davis to File a Claim Against JUUL

Heninger Garrison Davis is Alabama’s most prolific civil litigation law firm based in Birmingham, AL. We focus on personal injury, business litigation, mass tort, and class action cases. We possess the sophisticated legal skills, financial resources and multi-layered support needed to take on the world’s most powerful corporations. Our team works hard to cut through the complexity, get to the heart of the problem and win what matters the most.

Am I Limited to the Insurance Available After an Injury?

This may be one of the more complicated questions a personal injury lawyer can answer because there are so many factors to consider. Plus, the rules vary widely from one state to another. In general, an insurance company is not required to pay anything more than its policy limit. There are, of course, exceptions.

At Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, our main focus is to clearly and effectively advise and assist each of our clients to the fullest. This means providing straightforward communications, one-on-one consultations, and a clear path to your goals. Give us a call if you have suffered an injury and need help.

What is Insurance?

To understand your rights under an insurance policy, it is important to fully understand what insurance is. A person or business purchases a certain amount of insurance coverage in the event the person or business harms someone else. It is paid protection. If you hurt someone, your insurance company has a contractual duty to hire lawyers, defend you in court, and pay any judgments against you, up to the limits of coverage that you purchased. Your insurance company has no duties or obligations to the people you hurt.

What Happens if There is Not Enough Insurance?

Whether it is an injured party or an insured party, sometimes the insurance policy is not enough. Say, for instance, you are injured by a drunk driver who carried a small $25,000 policy. But you suffered broken bones and incurred over $50,000 in medical bills. Your injury could be worth far more than the insurance that the drunk driver purchased.

In this situation, if you were to get a judgment against the driver for more than $100,000, the insurance company would be obligated to pay $25,000, and you would have to try to collect the difference from the drunk driver individually. If that person has no financial means to pay, then you could be left undercompensated for your injuries.

Duty to Act in Good Faith

In the example above, the insurance company would be wise to pay the full value of its policy. This is because it has a duty to deal fairly with injured parties and with their own insured. If the insurance company refuses to pay or is unreasonable in handling the claim, they could expose their own insured person to a lawsuit or an excess judgment. This obligation is known as “good faith.”  When insurance companies intentionally delay, use unlawful tactics, or refuse to pay a reasonable sum of money to settle a claim, thereby leaving their own insured party exposed to a judgment, they are said to be acting in “bad faith.” Some states even provide a statutory remedy for going after an insurance company that acts in bad faith.

What is a Bad Faith Lawsuit?

Imagine that you paid your insurance premiums for years and one day you do something stupid and drive while a little intoxicated. You cause an auto accident and seriously injure someone. Your insurance company refuses to resolve the claim fairly, and the injured person sues you. They obtain a sizeable judgment against you, garnish your wages, put a lien on your home, and place you in financial ruin. Now imagine that the injured party had offered to settle the case for the amount of insurance that you had available, but your insurance company took an unreasonable gamble with your future.

This is exactly how insurance companies breach their contractual duties to their clients every day, leaving people exposed even after they pay their premiums year after year.

How to Collect Money for Bad Faith

There are a couple ways this can happen. First, if you are the negligent insured party against whom the insurance company has committed bad faith, you can sue your insurance company for bad faith and breach of contract. This may help you recover compensation for the harm that was caused by the insurance company refusing to honor its obligations.

On the other hand, if you are the injured person who can not collect because of an insurance company’s bad faith, you may be able to get the negligent party to file the lawsuit then “assign” it to you. This just means they agree to give you the money from the bad faith lawsuit in exchange for you not suing them. This allows you to bypass the negligent driver and pursue compensation from the insurance company. By doing this, sometimes there is actually a way to collect more compensation than the value of the insurance policy.

How We Help

At Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, we can help to review the insurance company’s practices to see if they have committed bad faith. These actions are somewhat rare, but when successful, you could obtain sizeable compensation. Never assume that an insurance company knows what it is doing or is acting within the law. Many times they are not. Call us today to schedule a private free consultation to review your options.

 

 

HGD’s Lew Garrison Leads Panel on JUUL Litigation

HGD’s Lew Garrison helped to lead an important panel discussion for the Young Lawyers Section on Friday, November 22 at the Birmingham Bar Center. The first panel focused on Cannabis, Vaping Law, and the 1st Amendment.  Panelists discussed new developments and trends in the law and answered questions from the attendees regarding the JUUL litigation, among other topics. The panel was moderated by Jeanie Sleadd, also from HGD.

 

Five HGD Attorneys Selected to 2019 Mid-South Super Lawyers!

 

Heninger Garrison Davis is proud to announce that Tim Davis, Gayle Douglas, Lew Garrison, Erik Heninger, and Steve Heninger have been selected to the 2019 Mid-South Super Lawyers list. Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. Super Lawyers Magazines also feature editorial profiles of attorneys who embody excellence in the practice of law. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com

HGD’s Jeff Leonard Scores Legal Victory Against Arkansas’s Largest Hospital System

Class Action Lawsuit Tests Baptist Billing Tactic

Originally published in Arkansas Business by Mark Friedman mfriedman@ABPG.com

A little Rock Firefighter recently scored a legal victory against the state’s largest hospital system over how it bills

patients injured by the actions of others. Chief US District Judge D.P. Marshall, Jr. Ruled that the suit, filed by Brian Whitley against Baptist Health of Little Rock, will proceed as a class action. Whitley is represented by Heninger Garrison Davis with Jeff Leonard as lead counsel.

Baptists’s billing strategy, plaintiffs say, can delay and reduce financial settlements to which victims are entitled. Whitley’s suit stems from a car accident in November 2013, in which he was severely injured by a driver going the wrong way on Interstate 440. The firefighter, a North Little Rock resident with health insurance through QualChoice of Little Rock, was taken to Baptist Health Medical Center-Little Rock.

But instead of billing QualChoice for the medical care, Baptist Health filed a medical lien against Whitley. Here’s why: QualChoice would have paid a discounted rate negotiated with Baptist for its insurance customers. The medical lien against Whitley directly could result in a much higher list-price payment from the proceeds of any settlement Whitley would get from the at-fault driver’s insurance.

Whitley sued Baptist Health in 2016 and sought class-action status, accusing the hospital of violating the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Judge Marshall said the class members will be patients who had health insurance through one of six major providers and from whom Baptist sought to recover the full amount of the bill through other sources, such as the at-fault driver or his liability carrier.

In Whitley’s case, Baptist left a $64,000 lien in place against Whitley, even though it billed QualChoice for his treatment, and QualChoice paid a portion of the bill. The lien prevented Whitley from receiving a $50,000 settlement from the at-fault driver’s insurance carrier. The lien was eventually released, and Whitley received the settlement.

“It’s unclear exactly how many of these patients Baptist treated like Whitley,” Marshall wrote in his 22-page opinion and order filed Sept. 13 in U.S. District Court in Little Rock. More than 6000 people are estimated to be in the class. Baptist Health said in its court filings that first seeking payment from liability insurance carriers rather than a patient’s health insurance company is standard procedure for hospitals, and it did nothing wrong.

– – –

One of Whitley’s attorneys, Jeffrey Leonard of Birmingham, Alabama, quizzed Donna Crutchfield, Baptist’s director of patient financial services, about what would be better financially for the patient – paying a health insurance copay for the treatment or the hospital’s full list amount of the price.

“We bill…the same way every single time, whether the patient is going to owe more or less,” Crutchfield said. “We don’t pay any attention to what ‘s best for the patient financially.”

 

Read the full article here

 

Five HGD Attorneys Selected to Super Lawyers 2019 Mid-South Rising Stars

 

Heninger Garrison Davis is proud to announce that Taylor Bartlett, Mark Ekonen, Drew Haskins, Caroline Hollingsworth, and Jeanie Sleadd have been selected to the Super Lawyers 2019 Mid-South Rising Stars list. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. Super Lawyers Magazines also feature editorial profiles of attorneys who embody excellence in the practice of law. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com.

HGD RECOGNIZED IN U.S. NEWS – BEST LAWYERS® 2020 “BEST LAW FIRMS” RANKINGS

WASHINGTON – Nov. 1, 2019 – Heninger Garrison Davis (HGD) is proud to announce that six of the firm’s practices have been recognized by U.S. News – Best Lawyers^® in the 2020 edition of “Best Law Firms”. HGD  received four first-tier rankings in metropolitan regions.

The U.S. News – Best Lawyers^® Best Law Firms rankings are based on a rigorous evaluation process that considers overall firm performance, client and lawyer evaluations, and peer recognition from leading attorneys across the United States. Firms included in the 2020 “Best Law Firms” rankings are recognized for professional excellence with consistently impressive ratings from clients and peers.

The HGD practices recognized in the 2020 edition of “Best Law Firms” include

Metropolitan Tier 1

• Birmingham
• Commercial Litigation
• Mass Tort Litigation / Class Actions – Plaintiffs
• Medical Malpractice Law – Plaintiffs
• Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs

Metropolitan Tier 2

• Birmingham
• Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

Metropolitan Tier 3

• Birmingham
• Litigation – Insurance

To be eligible for a ranking, a firm must first have a lawyer recognized in The Best Lawyers in America©, which recognizes the top 5% of private practicing lawyers in the United States. Achieving a tiered ranking signals a unique combination of quality law practice and breadth of legal expertise. “Choosing the right law firm can be a vital decision,” said Tim Smart, executive editor at U.S. News & World Report.

“The rankings draw on U.S. News’ 35 years of experience evaluating complex institutions to help individuals and companies alike make the best decisions.” The 2020 rankings are based on the highest number of participating firms and client votes received on record. Almost 16,000 lawyers provided more than 1,229,000 law firm assessments, and more than 12,000 clients participated providing 107,000 evaluations.

“For the 2020 ‘Best Law Firms’ publication, the evaluation process has remained just as rigorous and discerning as it did when we first started ten years ago.” says Phil Greer, CEO of Best Lawyers. “This year we reviewed 14,931 law firms throughout the United States – across 75 national practice areas – and a total of 2,106 firms received a national law firm ranking. We are proud that the ‘Best Law Firms’ rankings continue to act as an indicator of excellence throughout the legal industry.”

Ranked firms, presented in three tiers, are recognized on a national and regional-based scale. Firms that received a tier designation reflect the highest level of respect a firm can earn among other leading lawyers and clients from the same communities and practice areas. Awards were given in 75 national practice areas and 127 metropolitan practice areas.

HGD’s Jeanie Sleadd honored by This is Alabama as one of the “Women Who Shape the State for 2019

 

HGD is excited to announce that attorney Jeanie Sleadd is being honored by This is Alabama as one of the “Women Who Shape the State for 2019.” This is Alabama will recognize and celebrate the 2019 class of Women Who Shape the State on November 14 at a luncheon at The Club. This year’s luncheon will honor thirty Alabamians making a difference in their community. These women are united in their commitment to driving movements, businesses and industries that change lives and make a difference in our state.

Raised in Eufaula, Alabama by two teachers, Jeanie Sleadd learned the value of hard work early in life. That doggedness carried on through her adult years and now, as a class action attorney, she represents people from all over the country who have been injured by products or betrayed by their employers. “One of my most impactful cases is currently going on in my ‘backyard,’ so to say,” Sleadd says. “I represent over 100 residents from the historic Fountain Heights community who are suffering from environmental injustices.” Outside of her career, Sleadd also advocates for Alabama youth and improving public education.

Biggest woman power moment: “There hasn’t been a single ‘woman power moment,’ but a progression, an acknowledgment, and an acceptance that I can be a leader, should be a leader, must be a leader. One of my most empowering moments practicing was at a hearing where on one side were 30 attorneys—30 male attorneys—and on the other side just me.”

Jeanie practices in the firm’s mass tort group with a focus on pharmaceutical and medical device litigation. In addition to mass torts and class actions, Jeanie represents clients in an array of matters including product liability, worker’s compensation, FELA, wrongful death, slip and falls, contract disputes, and ERISA cases. Jeanie received her law degree from the University of Alabama School of Law.

Jeanie is a member of the Rotaract Club of Birmingham, serves as the President of the Young Alumni Council for her alma mater, and sits on the Downtown YMCA Advisory Board.

 

Meet the 2019 Women Who Shape the State honorees

HGD’s Tim Davis named to Who’s Who in Law 2019

HGD’s Managing Partner, Tim Davis, is featured as one of Birmingham’s Who’s Who in Law 2019 this month by the Birmingham Business Journal.

While Birmingham attorneys have always played important roles advising businesses and navigating regulations, law firms are increasingly relied upon to fill important roles in the philanthropic world and in the business scene at large.

Fortunately, the Magic City has a legal community that has proven to be up to the challenge.

In our annual Who’s Who in Law feature, we put the spotlight on key leaders to know in the local legal scene. Meet them all in the gallery above.

The bulk of individuals on the List are the local managing partners for the firms ranking on our most recent Law and Litigation firm lists. But we’ve also included key names to know in the legal education world, as well as officers for bar associations in the Magic City, among other notable legal industry leaders.

Erik Heninger Selected as a Fellow in The Trial Lawyer Honorary Society by the Litigation Counsel of America

HGD congratulates partner Erik Heninger on his invitation to become a Fellow in The Trial Lawyer Honorary Society by the Litigation Counsel of America. The Litigation Counsel of America (LCA) is an invitation-only trial lawyer honorary society established to reflect the new face of the American bar. Membership is limited to 3,500 Fellows, representing less than one-half of one percent of American lawyers. The composition of the LCA is aggressively diverse, with recognition of excellence among American litigation and trial counsel across all segments of the bar.

The purpose of the LCA is to recognize deserving, experienced, and highly qualified lawyers, to provide an outlet for scholarly authorship of legal articles on trial and litigation practice, to provide additional sources for professional development, to promote superior advocacy and ethical standards in the practice of law, to assist in community involvement by its membership, and to advance a superior judiciary, by taking relevant positions on issues or legislation affecting judicial compensation and/or benefits, as well as those affecting the American litigation processes.

Erik is a founding partner of Heninger Garrison Davis law firm and is located in the Birmingham office. In addition to assisting clients, Erik believes that serving in state and national bar associations is essential to being a complete lawyer. Given that belief, Erik makes a point of being active in city, state, and national legal organizations. He is very active in the American Association of Justice (AAJ) where he teaches trial advocacy and litigation techniques to other lawyers across the country. These trial colleges allow Erik to offer his knowledge and experience and also expose him to innovative ideas being used by other lawyers. Erik also focuses on the State of Alabama through his involvement with the Alabama Association of Justice (ALAJ), serving as an Officer since 2017.

Currently, Erik represents the 10th Judicial Circuit (Birmingham) as an elected member of the Board of Bar Commissioners for the Alabama State Bar. As part of his Commissioner responsibilities, Erik sits on the Alabama State Bar Character & Fitness Committee and the Disciplinary Rules & Enforcement Committee. Finally, he has been a member of the Birmingham Bar Executive Committee since 2016. Erik is “AV Preeminent” Rated by Martindale-Hubbell – the highest possible distinction conferred by both professional peers and judges. In 2013, he was inducted as a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), an invitation only organization committed to preserving the right to trial by jury. 

Huge Win for Plaintiff in Class Action Against Virginia College

Today, in a big victory for the plaintiff, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s denial of Virginia  College’s motion to compel arbitration. The Court found that the plaintiff’s claims were related to being a student at Virginia College and not related to his employment there.  Therefore, the scope of the plaintiff’s arbitration agreement did not encompass the claims he brought against Virginia College.

The plaintiff in this case, Keven Robinson, sued Virginia College and its parent company, Education Corporation of America, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, for allegedly awarding worthless degrees, deceiving former and current students, and depriving students of postgraduation services and employment opportunities. The case is Keven Robinson, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, versus Virginia College, LLC, and Education Corporation of America. The attorneys representing the plaintiffs are Lew Garrison, Taylor Bartlett, Chris Hood, and Mark Ekonen with Heninger Garrison Davis law firm in Birmingham.

HGD Holds Awards Ceremony for 2019 Closing Argument Competition Winners!

L-R: Drew Haskins, Erik Heninger, Ray Foushee, Malia Tartt, Glen McCord, Tzena Gauldin, and Tim Davis

HGD held the official awards presentation today for the 6th Annual “In Summation” Closing Argument Competition in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room. Tim Davis, Erik Heninger, Drew Haskins – all attorneys, along with Tzena Gauldin, Firm Administrator, presented each winner with an awards plaque and a cash prize. Ray Foushee, a 3L at Birmingham School of Law, won first place in the competition. Glen McCord, a 3L from Birmingham School of Law, took home the second place, and Malia Tartt, a 2L from BSL, won third place.

Held in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room at the downtown Birmingham office, the original field of competitors was narrowed down to a top six who paired off in the final rounds last week. The jury was comprised of HGD attorneys and staff, and HGD attorney Drew Haskins presided over the competition as the judge.

HGD holds this competition for local law school students to help promote advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills. Congratulations to the winners and all the law students who participated in this competition.

Congratulations to HGD’s Closing Argument Competition 2019 Winners!

Congratulations to the winners in HGD’s 5th Annual “In Summation” Closing Argument Competition: BSL’s Ray Foushee wins 1st Place and $1000; BSL’s Glen McCord wins 2nd Place and $750; and Malia Tartt from BSL wins 3rd Place and $500. HGD holds this competition for local law school students to help promote advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills.

Held in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room, the original field of competitors was narrowed down to a top six who paired off in the final rounds last night. The jury was comprised of HGD attorneys and staff, and HGD attorneys Drew Haskins presided over the competition as the judge.

An official presentation of the winning prizes is forthcoming. HGD congratulates all the law students who competed the last two weeks.

Congratulations to the 6 Finalists in HGD’s Closing Argument Competition 2019!

Congratulations to the top 6 finalists in HGD’s 5th Annual Closing Argument Competition 2019, “In Summation.” The six finalists who will be competing for the top three spots this week are John Banks, Ray Foushee, Sheila Goodwin, Glen McCord, Ashley Smith, and Malia Tartt.

Heninger Garrison Davis takes great pride in this event and the learning opportunity it provides for students attending Cumberland School of Law and Birmingham School of Law. Our goal is to encourage advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills.

Each participant was given a trial problem and asked to present a closing argument before a mock jury that includes judges, lawyers and laypersons. The final round is Thursday, October 3 in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room in our downtown Birmingham office.

The prizes for the top three are: 

1^st Place will receive $1,000 & an engraved plaque

2^nd Place will receive a check for $750 & an engraved plaque

3^rd Place will receive a check for $500 & an engraved plaque

Good luck to all our finalists!