Judge Upholds $4.7 Billion Talc Verdict, Citing J&J’s ‘Reprehensible Conduct’

A St. Louis judge has upheld a $4.7 billion talcum powder verdict, a move that comes just one day after another judge refused to toss out the state of Mississippi’s case against Johnson & Johnson. In a Wednesday order, 22nd Circuit Court Judge Rex Burlison refused to grant Johnson & Johnson’s motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, new trials, and new trials on damages.

The July 13 verdict, awarded to 22 women, is the largest against Johnson & Johnson in cases alleging that its baby powder caused women to get ovarian cancer. Burlison concluded there was “substantial evidence” to support the $550 million in compensatory damages and that punitive damages, which totaled more than $4 billion, were constitutional.

“First, substantial evidence was adduced at trial of particularly reprehensible conduct on the part of defendants, including that defendants knew of the presence of asbestos in products that they knowingly targeted for sale to mothers and babies, knew of the damage their products caused, and misrepresented the safety of these products for decades,” he wrote. “Second, defendants’ actions caused significant physical harm and potential physical harm, including causing ovarian cancer in plaintiffs or plaintiffs’ decedents.”

An additional factor noted by Burlison was that the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act provides for such potential penalties.

A Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.

In opposing Johnson & Johnson’s posttrial motions, plaintiffs lawyers had insisted that the trial presented a “perfect storm of highly reprehensible conduct.” Johnson & Johnson, meanwhile, argued in its own flurry of motions that the court lacked jurisdiction over the New Jersey-based pharmaceutical firm, and that plaintiffs failed to prove their claims. What’s more, the company also alleged misconduct against the plaintiffs’ lead trial lawyer, Mark Lanier, for his referencing stillborn babies in an opening statement and showing the jury a drawing of a bottle of Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder pushing a woman over a ledge into “ovarian cancer.”

Johnson & Johnson also said there was no evidence that its product caused ovarian cancer and criticized the plaintiffs’ experts.

Burlison, however, never mentioned Lanier’s conduct at trial and found there was more than enough evidence on causation. “The evidence presented at trial includes the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, evidence of the testing of the products at issue, including defendants’ own testing, defendants’ correspondence and the testimony of defendants’ corporate representative and chief medical officer,” he wrote. “This evidence satisfies the standards for causation under all applicable state law.”

Lanier, of The Lanier Law Firm in Houston, said in an emailed statement: ”Judge Burlison’s well-reasoned decision recites the science, evidence, and the law in upholding an important judgment that delivers justice to 22 victims of an insidious cancer. We look forward to arguing this same evidence and science to the appellate courts.”

Separately, on Tuesday, Hinds County Chancery Court Judge Dewayne Thomas refused to grant Johnson & Johnson’s summary judgment in the only case brought by an attorney general over talcum powder. Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood brought the case in 2014 under the Mississippi Consumer Protection Act.

“In this case, there are clearly material issues to which one party swears to one version and the other party swears to the opposite,” Thomas wrote. “In the instance of a complex legal matter involving such serious allegations, the court does have grave doubts as to the wisdom of terminating this action prior to a full trial.”

A spokeswoman for the Mississippi attorney general’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

(Law.com by Amanda Bronstad, December 19, 2018) https://www.law.com/2018/12/19/judge-upholds-4-7-billion-talc-verdict-citing-jjs-reprehensible-conduct/

 

The post Judge Upholds $4.7 Billion Talc Verdict, Citing J&J’s ‘Reprehensible Conduct’ appeared first on .

New Evidence from the VA Explains Connection Between TBI and Pain

by HGD Staff

When people are injured in motor vehicle accidents or falls, they often suffer objective and visible physical injuries, such as broken bones and open wounds. However, there are sometimes invisible wounds that can only be diagnosed through the use of highly specialized diagnostic imaging, such as MRI or CT Scan technology. These can be difficult to identify and prove, but even more difficult to understand. People suffering from serious injuries may display complex symptoms. One type of injury that is frequently misunderstood is the traumatic brain injury (TBI).

In researching the effects of TBI on combat veterans, researchers with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs have made some remarkable findings regarding TBI and how those with TBI may experience pain in different ways.

If you have been injured and suffered a serious and life-changing TBI, call Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC to speak with a TBI injury attorney today.

Veteran Research Leads to Amazing Findings

VA research in 2018 revealed that veterans with moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries experienced greater incidence of chronic pain – in particular chronic headaches – than other veterans with similar physical conditions but without TBI. This lead researchers to focus on isolating the underlying causes of chronic pain in relation to TBI. The suggested findings are somewhat remarkable:

● With or without chronic pain, TBI disrupts the brain functions designed to interfere with pain perception.
● People with TBI may live with chronic neuropathic pain, despite physically recovering from their injuries.
● The more severe the TBI, the greater the chronic pain.

What Research May Mean for Accident Survivors

Naturally, TBI research has implications that far exceed just the context of military and veteran populations. For those attorneys who routinely represent injury victims and auto accident survivors, this research may be an early indicator that insurance companies are greatly underestimating the value of compensation in auto accident claims.

We typically think of an injury in tangible and physical ways. A broken arm costs a certain amount to fix, and the pain will last a certain amount of time. Therefore, compensation is focused on those tangible and reasonably identifiable measurements. However, when a person suffers from a TBI, they may have ongoing pain for years to come, perhaps even indefinitely, even long after the underlying injuries have resolved.

Therefore, when negotiating with insurance companies, an injured person or their attorney should focus on how the TBI may create lingering pain effects into the future. This should always be considered when discussing the valuation of an injury claim.

Typical TBI Symptoms

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), about 2.5 million people suffer from TBI each year. Many are the result of accidents, falls, assaults, and other major traumas. If you suspect TBI, keep an eye open for the following common symptoms:

● Nausea
● Headache
● Disorientation
● Changes in behavior or mood
● Perception issues
● Loss of manual dexterity
● Balance issues (vertigo)
● Changes in taste or smell

How an Experienced TBI Injury Lawyer can Help

At Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, our team knows TBI. When you hire our firm, we will quickly work to gather crucial pieces of evidence that help to establish how and why you suffered a brain injury. We will work closely with your medical providers and even work with medical experts in the field to help establish the nature and extent of TBI and how it will likely affect you in the future.

With decades of combined experience, you can count on us to handle your case with care. With offices throughout the country, we have teams available to work with you in New York, New Jersey, Alabama, and Georgia. Perhaps this is why attorneys from all over the country refer clients to Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, and our attorneys represent clients throughout the country, obtaining excellent verdicts and settlements. Many of our clients come to us after being turned down by other firms or after being told they could not recover.

If you need help with your case or you are an attorney with a client suffering from a complex TBI, call our firm to discuss further. We never charge for consultations, and our team has the resources and skill needed to handle even the most complex cases. So call or visit us online to get started today. 1-800-241-9779.

Read more here. 

 

The post New Evidence from the VA Explains Connection Between TBI and Pain appeared first on .

Taylor Bartlett, Chris Hood, and Amanda Williamson All Named Partners at Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC

Taylor Bartlett, Amanda Williamson, and Chris Hood

HGD is pleased to announce that it will begin 2019 with three new partners. Taylor Bartlett, Chris Hood, and Amanda Williamson have been overwhelmingly endorsed for partnership.

 
Taylor Bartlett represents clients in complex litigation involving significant damages claims at both the trial and appellate levels. He has extensive experience in consumer class actions and pharmaceutical mass tort litigation. Since joining the firm in 2011, Taylor has successfully represented over 5,000 individuals and businesses throughout the United States. Taylor has also been appointed as class counsel on multiple consumer class action lawsuits that resulted in settlements to the classes of over $25 million. Taylor obtained his undergraduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Auburn University in 2007 and he received his J.D. cum laude from Cumberland School of Law in 2010. Taylor and his wife Laura are residents of Redmont Park in Birmingham and are members of St. Luke’s Episcopal Church. They are proud parents of a Labrador named Louie. Taylor has an active interest in classic cars and enjoys spending time behind the wheel as President of the Mountain Brook Driving Club.

Chris Hood has been a member of the firm’s mass tort group since 2008, and he devotes his practice to consumer and environmental class actions, fraud and business torts, and personal injury or death caused by dangerous prescription medicines and medical devices.  He also handles appeals in many of the firm’s major cases.  He lives in Vestavia Hills and is a member of the Birmingham Bar Association, the American Bar Association, the Alabama Association for Justice, and the American Association for Justice.  He graduated from UNC-Chapel Hill and Georgetown University. Chris, along with HGD partners Lew Garrison and Jim McDonough, represents corn farmers in the first CAFA mass action in the country involving genetically modified corn seeds.  He also serves with other HGD attorneys as counsel for a proposed class of 12,000 retired employees of Allstate.  These are two of his key active cases.

Amanda Williamson represents clients injured by harmful medical drugs and devices, defective products, and fraudulent practices. She has years of experience in national mass tort consolidation. Amanda was appointed to the Plaintiff’s Executive Committee in In re Depakote where she represented children with serious birth defects against the manufacturer of the drug Depakote. Amanda’s practice also focuses on other personal injury cases including medical negligence and nursing home abuse where she has obtained multi-million dollar verdicts for her clients.  She graduated with honors from The University of Alabama with a Bachelor of Science in Commerce and Business Administration. She then attended Cumberland School of Law where she was a member of the American Journal of Trial Advocacy. She joined Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC in 2011.

 

HGD appreciates their commitment, respects their character and looks forward to working alongside them in their new roles.

The post Taylor Bartlett, Chris Hood, and Amanda Williamson All Named Partners at Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC appeared first on .

UChicago Pre-Law Students Visit HGD During Civil Rights Tour

HGD welcomed 21 pre-law students from UChicago for lunch during their week long civil rights tour of Montgomery and Birmingham. The visit was organized by Claudia Macias-Retson, Senior Assistant Director of UChicago Careers in Law, and HGD’s Honza Prchal, a UChicago Alumnus. Tim Davis, Managing partner, welcomed the group and discussed the practice of Intellectual Property law. Erik Heninger and Bill Bross also spoke with the group about different types of law and fielded questions about how civil rights issues affect the day to day practice.

The UChicago students visited the Legacy Museum in Montgomery, the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute, and Birmingham’s historic Kelly Ingram Park among other sites during their visit. The University of Chicago is an urban research university that has driven new ways of thinking since 1890.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post UChicago Pre-Law Students Visit HGD During Civil Rights Tour appeared first on .

HGD Welcomes Restoration Academy 4th Grade Musical Group

December 18, 2018

HGD had the pleasure of enjoying Restoration Academy’s 4th Grade Class performing several Christmas musical selections for our downtown Birmingham office today. Under the direction of Kimberly Jones, Restoration’s Elementary music teacher, the students were celebrating Polar Express day, dressed up in pajamas and festive holiday attire.Ty Williams, Restoration Academy’s Director of Development & Community Affairs, introduced the group along with their classroom teacher, Elizabeth Ragland.

L-R: Elizabeth Ragland, 4th Graders, Tim Davis, Ty Williams, and Kimberly Jones.

Restoration Academy was started in 1988 by Dr. Anthony Gordon and Sharon Gordon. They founded the school in response to divisive forces such as crime and violence that had ensnared many of the young people at his church and in his community. Their goal was to provide a quality, private education to predominantly lower-income families. They believed that every child should at least have access to a quality education.

Ty Williams introduces the group

To this day, the school has stayed committed to Dr. Gordon’s vision by making a quality and Christ-centered education available to children in grades K5–12. In 1999 the school relocated to the Fairfield community and is now a vital and integral part of the Western area of town.

Kimberly Jones directing the students

 

Restoration Academy 4 Graders performing

The post HGD Welcomes Restoration Academy 4th Grade Musical Group appeared first on .

HGD’s Drew Haskins and Jeff Leonard speak at National Business Institute Conference

Jeff Leonard and Drew Haskins spoke as faculty members at the National Business Institute CLE Seminar in Birmingham, Alabama, “Building Your Civil Litigation Skills.”

HGD Partner – Jeff Leonard

Jeff Leonard’s presentation, Preparation – Trial Will Not Go Well Unless You are Well-Prepared, used the metaphor of football and expanded from there:

“Trial is similar to football . . . if it were a one-game season.  You must organize, review, prepare, summarize, and practice beforehand. You must know all the facts.  You must even coach your own players (your witnesses) before the game; and get into the head of opposing players (their witnesses). No foreseen eventuality (on-side kick or evidentiary dispute) should be left to chance.  If you have prepared, trial should be fun, not an anxiety-filled week of all-nighters. As a reward for the days or weeks of hard work and preparation, you get a trial much like a football player gets a Saturday game and the opportunity to hit opposing players. Preparation is key.”

Read more about Jeff Leonard Here

HGD Attorney – Drew Haskins

Drew Haskins spoke on tactics used in jury selection. At Heninger Garrison Davis, our lawyers and staff are thinking about and preparing for trial from the first client interview.  We take the time and pay close attention to the details of each client’s case, always with trial preparation in mind, whether a case actually goes to trial or not.  It’s this committed and creative approach to each case that makes our firm unique and successful.

Read more about Drew Haskins Here.

The post HGD’s Drew Haskins and Jeff Leonard speak at National Business Institute Conference appeared first on .

Six Key Regulations Applicable to Trucking Accident Cases

by HGD Staff

 

Every year, thousands of people are injured in accidents with semi-trucks throughout America. Many of these injuries arefatal, leaving families to suffer the loss of a loved one, as well as a drastic drop in family income. Trucking accident cases are different than auto accidents for a number of reasons. Perhaps the most distinct difference is the number of federal and state regulations that apply to the trucking industry. Among these federal rules, here are six particular rules that injured motorists should understand if involved in a collision with a commercial truck.

 

Hours of Service

 

Hours of service rules are much more complicated than they initially seem. Without oversimplifying them, the general principles work like this. Over-the-road interstate truck drivers must follow rules for how long they can drive and work in a given period of time. Unlike most people, truck drivers work 24/7, so their sleep schedules often get interrupted, and they may find themselves working all sorts of hours, day or night. The rules are slightly different depending on whether the vehicle is a cargo truck or passenger vehicle, like a bus. For most tractor-trailers, the rules are:

 

• 11-hour Rule: Drivers must not drive more than 11 hours within a work period.
• 14-hour Rule: A work period totals no more than 14 hours (including up to 11 hours of drive time).
• 10-hour Rule: Once the driver finishes his or her day, they will need 10 hours of off-duty time for sleep and rest before he or she can start work again.
• 8-hour Rule: Drivers can not drive for more than eight straight consecutive hours without taking at least a 30-minute break.

 

A driver records his or her work and drive time via log books. Compliance with hours of service requirements can now be recorded electronically by e-logs. Many large companies are moving toward e-logs as a way to reduce the chance of driver error.

 

Inspections

 

Per Section 396.11 of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR), drivers must complete pre- and post-trip inspections each day in operation. This means that before the driver gets behind the wheel each day to drive, he or she must perform a thorough walk-around of the vehicle, checking things like brake lines, tire pressure, fluids, trailer tandems, and the load (if applicable). At the end of each day, the same things must be done. The driver must complete and turn in a driver vehicle inspection report and turn it in to the company.

 

Cell Phone Use

 

Regardless of your state’s cell phone laws, interstate truck drivers are strictly prohibited from using a handheld device for any purpose. This means no texting, no talking, no surfing, and no GPS. They can mount the phone, and Bluetooth is acceptable. But any use of a handheld device is illegal, regardless of local or state laws.

 

Alcohol and Drug Use

 

Trucking companies must have an alcohol and drug testing compliance program in place. Even owner-operators have specific reporting rules. The key guidelines, however, say that after an accident, the trucking company must test the driver for drugs or alcohol. Likewise, state laws set the threshold for impairment much lower than for the general public. For instance, in New York, 0.08% is the blood alcohol concentration at which the law presumes impairment. It is only 0.04% for CDL truck drivers.

 

True and Accurate Maintenance Records

 

Trucking companies must also maintain proper and accurate records of maintenance. In 2018, most large trucking companies now automate their maintenance logs and maintain them as electronic systems, much like medical records. They are kept in the regular course of business and are subject to subpoena or discovery in litigation.

 

Accident Records

 

Motor carriers are required to maintain certain specific records and information regarding accidents and crashes. Among this information, carriers must keep insurance information, crash reports, and other documents that are requested by the federal government. These reports must be made to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), at which time much of the information is subject to request by the general public through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request.

 

Getting Skilled and Experienced Advice After a Trucking Accident

 

After a trucking accident, you can not afford to take your time. Trucking companies will quickly begin cleaning up the mess, destroying evidence, repairing the truck, and taking steps to avoid any liability. The sooner you call an attorney with trucking crash litigation experience, the sooner an attorney can begin protecting your rights. Call Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC today to schedule a free consultation. We will listen and offer advice, and we only take a fee if we succeed.

The post Six Key Regulations Applicable to Trucking Accident Cases appeared first on .

What Every Caregiver Should Know About Bedsores

by HGD Staff

If you have made the difficult decision to place a loved one in a nursing home, you may be concerned about the quality of care and medical treatment he or she will receive. Perhaps you have heard horror stories about abuse or neglect around the country and want to make sure your elderly loved one is protected.

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC helps families deal with the terrible consequences of nursing home abuse throughout Alabama and Georgia. We routinely help our clients secure financial compensation when these facilities and their owners put money before residents, and we know what it takes to get justice for seniors.

What are Bedsores?

Perhaps the most common injuries suffered by elderly nursing home residents, bedsores are serious wounds that can be life-threatening. The medical term for a bedsore is a “decubitus ulcer” or “pressure ulcer.” A bedsore is caused when the skin above a bony prominence, such as a tailbone, elbow, or hip bone, is exposed to pressure for an extended period of time. When a person is left in one position with weight is on his or her tailbone, eventually even a healthy person can develop a bruise in that area. Deep beneath the skin, the tissue begins to break down, and ultimately, if not properly treated, the skin will open, exposing a wound.

What are the Main Causes of Bedsores?

While there are rare situations in which pressure ulcers are due to trauma – falls, etc. – in most cases the cause is poor care. The risks go up when the patient has other risk factors. Major risk factors include:

• Poor nutrition
• Dehydration
• Certain medical conditions
• Immobility
• Being bed-bound
• Dementia (may forget to move around)
• Certain cancers

Here are a few scenarios that often lead to the development of pressure ulcers in nursing homes:

• Failure to reposition the resident
• Leaving a resident in wet and damp clothing or diapers
• Leaving dirty or soiled linens exposed to a wound
• Improper lifting and moving (friction injuries)
• Failing to use appropriate prevention methods
• Failing to use appropriate beds or tools to help alleviate wounds

What can be Done to Prevent Bedsores?

As a family member, it is important to remember that you should never try to lift, reposition, or move your loved one in a nursing home. You should always ask the staff to assist with these things. However, if you find that your loved one is soiled frequently or left in dirty clothing, you should address this, as it means two things – the wet clothing could make wounds develop faster and lead to infections and it could be a sign or poor staffing levels, as staff do not have time to get to all the patients during their shifts.

Here are some simple steps that nursing homes can and should use to help avoid pressure ulcers:

• Low air-loss mattresses. These help to prevent pressure from building up in one part of the body.
• Proper lifting and moving techniques
• Frequent and regular repositioning schedules
• Ensuring proper hydration
• Ensuring proper nutrition

Checking for Bedsores

As a family member, you have an opportunity to make a difference. If you visit your loved one often, you may notice certain red flags that serve as warning signs for bedsores. These include:

• A smell of meat or rotten flesh. This is a common scent when an open wound is untreated
• Bandages or coverings that hide the tailbone, collar bone, elbows, knees and hips, or heels.
• Heel protectors being used
• Signs of wound dressings in trash
• Other residents or their families discussing bedsores

What to do if You See or Suspect Bedsores

First and foremost, never try to render medical care unless you are licensed to do so. More importantly, you should take your concerns directly to the administrator of the facility. Make them aware of the problem and find out what they plan to do to correct the problem. Give the facility a chance to address the problem and hopefully implement strategies to fix it. If nothing changes, you may need to look at getting a transfer to a different facility.

Are Bedsores Preventable?

Absolutely. In the vast majority of cases, they are preventable. In fact, the federal government acknowledges this. Under Medicare rules, there are certain healthcare acquired conditions that are generally regarded as “never events.” This means that unless completely unpreventable, these events should never occur in a nursing home or healthcare environment. Bedsores are on the list. If a patient or nursing home resident acquires a preventable bedsore, then Medicare will generally decline to pay for the charges associated with correcting it or healing it. Therefore, nursing homes will often go to great lengths to make it look like they followed all the right procedures to prevent the wound. Sometimes this even means falsifying medical records.

Obtaining Compensation

If your loved one is suffering from painful wounds or has died due to a sepsis infection or some other related condition, contact Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC to discuss your options. You and your family may be entitled to significant compensation. The call is free, but do not wait too long. Time is limited for pursuing justice.

 

 

The post What Every Caregiver Should Know About Bedsores appeared first on .

HGD Donates Computer Monitors and Equipment to Birmingham Education Foundation

 

L-R: Lori Prince, Mary Phillips, Honza Prchal, Brad Jennings with Ed, Brian Stack, and Bill Bross

 

In our ongoing community partnership with Birmingham Education Foundation (Ed), HGD donated computer monitors and equipment to Birmingham Education Foundation to support and enhance the classroom experience of Birmingham City School students.

HGD is thankful for all the hard work that Ed does to support our Birmingham students. Ed is dedicated to increasing the number of students in the Birmingham City Schools that are on the path to college, career, and life readiness. Ed believes that this is only possible by cultivating a diverse network of people who demand excellence for our students and inspire others to do the same. HGD is proud to be a community partner with Birmingham Education Foundation in this endeavor.

The post HGD Donates Computer Monitors and Equipment to Birmingham Education Foundation appeared first on .

HGD Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Virginia College

December 5, 2018

Birmingham, Alabama

Until December 5, 2018, VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America, both Alabama headquartered companies, operated and ran one of the largest for-profit colleges in the United States including one located in Jefferson County, Alabama at 488 Palisades Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35209.  On the evening of December 4, 2018, the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools suspended VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America’s accreditation making all degrees previously earned valueless and any future degrees worthless also.  As a result of the lack of accreditation, VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America could no longer seek federal funding thus effectively shutting down their businesses.  As a result of the lack of accreditation, course work performed by Plaintiff Robinson and the Class are not recognized by other higher education providers which will require them to repeat and repay tuition for the same coursework at another institution in order to obtain degrees.

As of this morning, December 5, 2018, VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America closed all campuses nationwide leaving students and employees helpless.  Until December 5, 2018, Education Corporation of America operated more than 75 campuses and had at least 20,000 students enrolled in courses including cosmetology, culinary arts, massage therapy, medical assistant, and dental assistant.  On December 5, 2018, VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America abruptly closed their doors without warning current or former students and falsely blaming the Department of Education for the closures.  Former students who graduated with degrees now have those degrees tainted and devalued.

On December 5, 2018, Taylor Bartlett, Mark Ekonen, and W. Lewis Garrison of Heninger Garrison Davis filed a lawsuit on behalf of a former student who obtained three degrees from Virginia College.  Our plaintiff alleges that current students who have paid tuition to VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America have no chance of obtaining any degrees from VIRGINIA COLLEGE or Education Corporation of America and thus their tuition payments paid to date provided them no benefit.  He also alleges that VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America are liable to former students for some of the tuition paid while VIRGINIA COLLEGE and Education Corporation of America are liable to current students who have not yet obtained the degree they are seeking for their entire tuition payments.

The lawyers of Heninger Garrison Davis are looking for additional clients in any state who may have been impacted by Virginia College, Brightwood Career Institute, Ecotech Institute, and Golf Academy of America closures.  We are here to help and will speak with you free of charge.  We never get paid unless we recover something for you and it will never come out of your pocket.  Call us at 1-800-241-9779 or email us at intake@hgdlawfirm.com.

The post HGD Files Class Action Lawsuit Against Virginia College appeared first on .

Heninger Garrison Davis Named to Best Law Firms 2019 by US News and World Report

12/1/2018 Birmingham, Alabama

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC has been recognized by U.S. News and World Report and Best Lawyers® as a “Best Law Firm for 2019.” HGD is recognized with Tier 1 rankings in the following areas:

• Medical Malpractice Law – Plaintiffs
• Personal Injury Litigation – Plaintiffs
• Product Liability Litigation – Plaintiffs

U.S. News & World Report and Best Lawyers®, for the ninth consecutive year, collaboratively announce the release of the “Best Law Firms” rankings.

Firms included in the 2019 Edition of “Best Law Firms” are recognized for professional excellence with consistently impressive ratings from clients and peers. Achieving a tiered ranking signals a unique combination of quality law practice and breadth of legal expertise.

“U.S. News has more than 30 years of experience evaluating complex institutions and their service to consumers,” said Tim Smart, executive editor at U.S. News. “Law firms perform a vital role in American life, and ranking them is a key extension of our overall mission to help individuals and companies alike make important decisions.”

The 2019 rankings are based on the highest number of participating firms and highest number of client votes received on record. To be eligible for a ranking, a firm must have a lawyer recognized first in The Best Lawyers in America, which recognizes the top five percent of practicing attorneys in the U.S. Over 16,000 lawyers provided more than 1,125,000 law firm assessments, and almost 12,000 clients provided more than 107,000 evaluations.

“For the 2019 ‘Best Law Firms’ publication, the evaluation process has remained just as rigorous and discerning as it did when we first started almost ten years ago.” says Phil Greer, CEO of Best Lawyers. “This year we reviewed 14,643 law firms throughout the United States – across 75 national practice areas – and a total of 2,118 firms received a national law firm ranking. We are proud that the ‘Best Law Firms’ rankings continue to act as an indicator of excellence throughout the legal industry.”

Ranked law firms, presented in three tiers, are listed on a national and regional-based scale. Firms that received a tier designation reflect the high level of respect a firm can earn among other leading lawyers and clients in the same communities and practice areas.

Awards were given in 75 national practice areas and 122 metropolitan practice areas. Additionally, one “Law Firm of the Year” is named in 74 nationally ranked practice areas.

The 2019 Tier 1 national and metropolitan rankings will be featured in the “Best Law Firms” General Counsel Publication, which will be distributed to more than 30,000 in-house counsel, and in digital format to more than 60,000 private practice lawyers worldwide.

The 2019 “Best Law Firms” rankings can be seen in their entirety by visiting bestlawfirms.usnews.com.

# # #

ABOUT “BEST LAW FIRMS”

The U.S. News – Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on a rigorous evaluation process that includes the collection of client and lawyer evaluations, peer review from leading attorneys in their field, and review of additional information provided by law firms as part of the formal submission process. To be eligible for a 2019 ranking, a law firm must have at least one lawyer recognized in the 24th Edition of The Best Lawyers in America list for that particular location and specialty.

The post Heninger Garrison Davis Named to Best Law Firms 2019 by US News and World Report appeared first on .

Urgent Care or Emergency Room Care After a Car Accident?

The Importance of Seeking Proper Medical Treatment After A Birmingham Auto Injury

Going through an accident can be one of the worst experiences in life. It might leave you with physical and psychological pain. Recovering might take time depending on the severity of the accident. There is also the damage to property which might set you back a couple of thousands. That is why you need a Birmingham auto wreck lawyer to make sure you’re back to your normal routine as quickly as possible. Heninger Garrison Davis is a law firm you can trust to help you get the best out of the process. You might not be in pain after an accident but that does not mean you shouldn’t seek medical attention. You could have sustained internal injuries which could be life threatening without you even knowing.

Types of Accident Injury Treatment

The emergency room is the ideal choice if you have sustained any life-threatening injuries during the car accident. The name is self-explanatory and it is usually the hospital wing that is well-equipped and ready for emergency situations. Such emergency treatments could include broken bones, severe burns, uncontrollable bleeding, severe trauma or even difficulty breathing. You should ask for medical proof of any physical injuries for the purposes of insurance.

Wait Time

The waiting time will differ if you compare the urgent care with that of the emergency room. Urgent care tends to be faster when it comes to treating patients. Most patients that go through urgent care usually don’t wait for more than 15 minutes. Emergency rooms are the opposite. It is not always about first-come-first-serve basis because there could be someone who is in urgent need of medical attention compared to you. This could mean waiting even longer, especially if it is not a big hospital with a lot of doctors and nurses. Urgent care is usually open all hours of the week and you can seek medical attention at any given time. A car accident might happen at any given time and you don’t want to go for an option that has restrictions when it comes to the hours.

Medical Costs

Medical costs are usually a big consideration when it comes to decision making. Some people could decide to skip seeking medical attention when involved in an accident because of the costs involved. Such people may not have proper medical insurance. By doing this, they jeopardize their chances of getting the claim because there is no proof of physical harm or injury. Make sure you go to the hospital if you’re involved in an accident. This is important especially if the accident is not your fault. Chances are high that you will be compensated even for the medical bills that you incurred as a result of the accident. If you’re on a budget and concerned about the costs, urgent care is recommended. You get access to medical services easily and you get the proof in case you want to claim.

Contacting A Birmingham Auto Accident Attorney

You have two options when it comes to seeking medical treatment after an accident; but there is only one option for an injury attorney in Birmingham: Heninger Garrison Davis. Call us today to find out how we can help represent your accident claim, or few our full range of services at https://hgdlawfirm.com/practice_area/trucking-and-motor-vehicle-collisions/.

 

 

 

Heninger Garrison Davis

2224 1st Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

+1 205-326-3336

 

Follow us on social media:

https://www.facebook.com/hgdlawfirm/

https://twitter.com/HGDLawFirm

https://www.linkedin.com/company/heninger-garrison-davis-llc

The post Urgent Care or Emergency Room Care After a Car Accident? appeared first on .

HGD Welcomes Jonie Adams as New Paralegal!

HGD is excited to welcome Jonie Adams to our team as a Senior Litigation Paralegal. Jonie will be working with partner Jeffrey Leonard and the rest of the Litigation team at HGD.

Jonie graduated from Samford University with a BS in Paralegal Studies and received her JD from Birmingham School of Law.  She lives in Birmingham with her husband, John. Welcome aboard, Jonie!

 

 

The post HGD Welcomes Jonie Adams as New Paralegal! appeared first on .

VAPERS FILE FIRST NATIONAL LAWSUIT OVER PERMANENT LUNG INJURIES FROM JUUL E-CIGARETTE

BIRMINGHAM, AL: (November 9, 2018) – Two vapers from California and Alabama have sued JUULover injuries to their lungs caused by the JUUL e-cigarette.  The two Plaintiffs, Timothy Malaney and Brendan Gorman, allege that they were deceived by JUUL about the risks of addiction and permanent harm from the JUUL nicotine vape, and that their injuries were caused by that deceit.

The Plaintiffs seek compensation and medical monitoring for a national class of vapers suffering similar injuries.  Their suit, the first of its kind in the country, was filed in Los Angeles on October 26th.

Attorney Francois M. Blaudeau, MD, JD, who heads the Southern Institute for Medical & Legal Affairs, represents the Plaintiffs, together with Heninger Garrison Davis LLC partner Lew Garrison.  The Plaintiffs’ Los Angeles attorney is Steven Ritcheson of Insight PLC.

The Plaintiffs claim that JUUL failed to investigate and/or warn of the potential negative health consequences of its e-cigarette.  The company knew or should have known that chemicals and nicotine from the JUUL vape can cause a severe hypersensitivity reaction in the lungs, producing pneumonia and requiring hospitalization in otherwise healthy teenagers and young adults.  Additionally, daily JUUL use can lead to restrictive airway disease and permanent lung injury.  In patients who never smoked, or only occasionally smoked, the nicotine “hit” of JUUL can lead to nicotine addiction and behavioral dependency.

The suit asks for medical monitoring, because damage from vaping can be assessed by advanced pulmonary function testing and bronchoscopy which identify young adults at risk for long-term injury.

The Plaintiffs demand that JUUL establish a fund to medically monitor all JUUL users within the United States.  That will allow the medical community, the FDA, and the world to fully understand the negative health consequences of this vaping epidemic.

Vaping and vape products have become a global phenomenon with the United States vaping market expected to exceed 5.5 billion dollars in 2018.  JUUL is expected to capture 70% of this market.  Recently, medical research into vaping has begun to catch up with the industry, with new medical literature being released every day illustrating the negative health effects of e-cigarettes.

While vaping was believed to be a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes, the new studies being released paint a much different picture.  Not only is JUUL use found to have similar health consequences to traditional cigarette smoking, it also carries with it risks of distinct and permanent injuries not seen in regular tobacco smokers.  These facts indicate that JUUL falsely advertises its product as a trendy, fun and safe alternative to traditional cigarettes.

If you or a loved one have used JUUL, we would like to talk to you.  Please contact the JUUL Litigation Hotline at ph. 855-347-8590.

The lawsuit is Malaney et al. v JUUL Labs, Inc. et al., Superior Court of the State of California (Los Angeles County), No. 18 ST CV 02948.

#  #  #  #

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, is a national law firm, and our attorneys work for persons injured by defective products. The Southern Institute for Medical & Legal Affairs is a leader in representing patients and consumers hurt by bad drugs and dangerous devices.  To determine if you should file suit, consult one of our qualified lawyers as soon as possible to understand your options.  We do not charge any fees upfront. In fact, we will only charge attorney’s fees if we obtain compensation for you.  Call us today at ph. 855-347-8590 or visit https://hgdlawfirm.com/?s=JUUL.

No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers.

The post VAPERS FILE FIRST NATIONAL LAWSUIT OVER PERMANENT LUNG INJURIES FROM JUUL E-CIGARETTE appeared first on .

Four HGD Attorneys Selected to Super Lawyers 2018 Mid-South Rising Stars List

Heninger Garrison Davis is proud to announce that Taylor Bartlett, Mark Ekonen, Caroline Hollingsworth and Jeanie Sleadd have been selected to the Super Lawyers 2018 Mid-South Rising Stars list. Each year, no more than 2.5 percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. Super Lawyers Magazines also feature editorial profiles of attorneys who embody excellence in the practice of law. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com.

The post Four HGD Attorneys Selected to Super Lawyers 2018 Mid-South Rising Stars List appeared first on .

Five HGD Attorneys Selected to 2018 Mid-South Super Lawyers List!

Heninger Garrison Davis is proud to announce that Tim Davis, Gayle Douglas, Lew Garrison, Erik Heninger, and Steve Heninger have been selected to the 2018 Mid-South Super Lawyers list. Each year, no more than five percent of the lawyers in the state are selected by the research team at Super Lawyers to receive this honor.

Super Lawyers, a Thomson Reuters business, is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from more than 70 practice areas who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement. The annual selections are made using a patented multiphase process that includes a statewide survey of lawyers, an independent research evaluation of candidates and peer reviews by practice area. The result is a credible, comprehensive and diverse listing of exceptional attorneys.

The Super Lawyers lists are published nationwide in Super Lawyers Magazines and in leading city and regional magazines and newspapers across the country. Super Lawyers Magazines also feature editorial profiles of attorneys who embody excellence in the practice of law. For more information about Super Lawyers, visit SuperLawyers.com

The post Five HGD Attorneys Selected to 2018 Mid-South Super Lawyers List! appeared first on .

The Civil Justice System: Protecting Your Family

The post The Civil Justice System: Protecting Your Family appeared first on .

HGD’s Honza Prchal Receives Pro Bono Exemplar Award!

HGD congratulates attorney Honza Prchal who was recognized by The Alabama Access to Justice Commission and the Supreme Court of Alabama at a reception in Montgomery on Thursday, October 25, 2018 as a recipient of the Pro Bono Exemplar award. Pro Bono Exemplars are lawyers who provide 50 or more hours of qualified pro bono legal services under RPC 6.1. Pro Bono Exemplars are lawyers who provide 50 or more hours of qualified pro bono legal services under RPC 6.1.

Honza Prchal is an associate with HGD whose areas of emphasis include mass torts, especially pharmaceutical and medical device work, and also general litigation. He has spent at least half his time on mass torts even before he started working with W. Lewis Garrison, Jr. in 1997, and he continues to enjoy helping clients navigate and understand an esoteric and confusing area of law where it is far too easy and far too common for clients to feel like numbers, rather than individuals with claims.Honza is a member of the American Bar Association, Phi Delta Phi, the Birmingham Bar Association, the American Association for Justice, a life member of the Antient and Honourable Edmund Burke Society at the University of Chicago.

The post HGD’s Honza Prchal Receives Pro Bono Exemplar Award! appeared first on .

HGD’s Brandy Robertson Named President of Alabama Head Injury Foundation’s Birmingham Regional Board

Alabama Head Injury Foundation is pleased to announce that Brandy Robertson, attorney with Heninger Garrison Davis, will serve as President of AHIF’s Birmingham Regional Board for the fiscal year of 2019.  The Birmingham Regional Board, formed in 2014, exists to promote greater awareness about the challenges faced by traumatic brain injury survivors and their families.  It also works to provide education on the prevention of brain injuries as well as encouraging financial support of AHIF’s mission of improving the quality of life for survivors of traumatic brain injury and for their families.  AHIF is thankful for the dedicated service Brandy has already demonstrated through her involvement and service on the Regional Board, and looks forward to the exceptional leadership she will provide the Regional Board this year.

Brandy Robertson has been an attorney with Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, for seven years and practices in the areas of personal injury, wrongful death and medical malpractice matters. Brandy received her B.A. from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in Criminal Justice and her J.D.  from the Birmingham School of Law in 2006.  “The work of the Alabama Head Injury Foundation is very close to my heart.  My niece suffered a traumatic brain injury in a car accident and had she survived her injuries she would have needed the services offered by AHIF.”  This summer Brandy was able to attend the TBI camp for survivors and their families and was able to see firsthand the wonderful work of the AHIF.  “I am honored to serve as President of the Birmingham Regional Board and I look forward to helping AHIF further their mission of providing services to TBI survivors and their families.”

The post HGD’s Brandy Robertson Named President of Alabama Head Injury Foundation’s Birmingham Regional Board appeared first on .

Yes, You can Sue for Sexual Misconduct

By HGD Staff

Many victims of sexual misconduct feel there is nowhere to turn. Victims often worry that they will not be heard or that they will be punished for coming forward. While it is certainly easy to understand these fears, there is hope. The law does offer protections to sexual assault and harassment victims.

At Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC, our team of experienced legal professionals want to help. We have represented many assault survivors, victims of harassment and discrimination, and even those who have suffered from gender and sexual identity discrimination. For those who wonder what rights they have, the truth is, you can file a lawsuit and claim financial damages for what has happened. Here is what you need to know.

Understanding Sexual Misconduct

In the age of the #MeToo Movement, more and more women have come forward to speak truth about their stories of assault, discrimination, and harassment. Of course, it is important to remember that many men are the victims of assault and harassment, as well. Misconduct can be aimed at anyone.

When we talk about sexual misconduct, it is important to separate the various forms of misconduct and the potential remedies available. Consider just a few of the broad categories and options available for survivors.

Sexual Discrimination

The federal government agency in charge of regulating and enforcing anti-discrimination laws is known as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The EEOC defines discrimination as any adverse employment actions that are based on or directed at a protected class. So, discrimination can affect people because of their race, religion, age, national origin, sexual orientation or identity, and gender.

When discriminatory actions are taken against someone because of their gender, it is considered sexual discrimination. The law allows victims of discrimination to bring a lawsuit against their employer seeking compensation when the discrimination has caused some harm or loss. These adverse employment actions can include:

• Termination
• Reduction in pay
• Denial of job opportunities
• Refusing to permit transfers
• Denying promotions or pay increases

Sexual Harassment

Next, there is sexual harassment. This is technically just a form of sex discrimination; however, it is worth distinguishing that the term harassment is usually used in situations in which an employer or superior is using one’s gender as a grounds for inappropriate behavior of a sexual nature. As the EEOC explains, harassment can take on many forms. Here are just a few examples:

• Unwelcome touching
• Unwelcome advances
• Aggressive or threatening comments
• Repeated unwelcome sexual comments
• Displaying vulgarity or sexual content
• Creating a hostile working environment

It does not always require the employer to terminate a person’s employment in order to qualify as harassment. In some cases, the behavior is so egregious that the law will regard it as a “constructive termination.” This occurs when no reasonable person could be expected to continue tolerating or enduring the behavior. However, it is important that you, as the victim, make it clear and well-known that you do not approve of the behavior and want it to stop. Often a brief initial consultation with a skilled attorney can give you the confidence and information to protect your rights early.

Sexual Assault, Abuse, and Domestic Violence

Finally, there are criminal acts that go above and beyond mere discrimination or employment-related abuses. In all states, it is a crime to touch someone against his or her will.

Consider one such example. In New York, Penal Code Section 130.52 concerns “forcible touching.” The law clearly makes it a Class A Misdemeanor to touch another person for one’s own sexual gratification or for the purpose of humiliation or embarrassment. The law is exceedingly clear about this and even goes so far as to state that it expressly includes things like grabbing, pinching, or squeezing someone.

The important thing to remember is that your body is yours alone. If a person commits an act of unlawful touching in the workplace, it could rise to both a civil and criminal charge. No employee should ever be forced to spend day after day subjected to criminal conduct. Therefore, such behavior is often a strong piece of evidence in support of a claim for constructive termination.

How to Make a Claim and Protect Yourself

 The first thing any victim of sexual misconduct should do is document the behavior in as much detail as possible. Next, make it clear and well-known to your supervisor and management team that you are not okay with the behavior and you want it to stop immediately. Next, contact Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC to schedule a free consultation. Hopefully, your employer will take the message and stop the behavior in its tracks. If not, or if you face any retaliation, you will have an experienced team of attorneys at the ready, poised to take action on your behalf.

Serving clients in Georgia, Alabama, New Jersey and New York, the attorneys of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC are here to help when you need us.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The post Yes, You can Sue for Sexual Misconduct appeared first on .

HGD Holds Awards Ceremony for Closing Argument Competition Winners!

L-R: Erik Heninger – HGD Partner; Daron Drew – 3rd Place; Jordan Godwin – 1st Place; Tonya Howard-Mines 2nd Place; Gayle Douglas – HGD Partner; Tzena Gauldin – HGD Firm Administrator

HGD held the official awards presentation today for the 5th Annual “In Summation” Closing Argument Competition in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room. Erik Heninger and Gayle Douglas, both HGD Partners, along with Tzena Gauldin, Firm Administrator, presented each winner with an awards plaque and a cash prize. Jordan Godwin, a 2L at Cumberland School of Law, won first place in the competition. Tonya Howard-Mines, a 3L from Birmingham School of Law, took home the second place, and Daron Drew, also a 3L from BSL, won third place.

Held in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room at the downtown Birmingham office, the original field of competitors was narrowed down to a top six who paired off in the final rounds last week. The jury was comprised of HGD attorneys and staff, and HGD attorneys Drew Haskins and Chris Hood presided over the competition as the judge.

HGD holds this competition for local law school students to help promote advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills. Congratulations to the winners and all the law students who participated in this competition.

Jordan Godwin is presented with the 1st Place Prize. L-R: Erik Heninger, Jordan Godwin, Gayle Douglas, and Tzena Gauldin

 

Tonya Howard-Mines is presented with the 2nd Place Prize. Jordan Godwin is presented with the 1st Place Prize. L-R: Erik Heninger, Tonya Howard-Mines, Gayle Douglas, and Tzena Gauldin

 

Daron Drew is presented with the 3rd Place prize. L-R: Erik Heninger, Daron Drew, Gayle Douglas, and Tzena Gauldin

The post HGD Holds Awards Ceremony for Closing Argument Competition Winners! appeared first on .

Understanding the Differences Between Car Accidents and Trucking Accidents

By HGD Staff

Victims of motor vehicle crashes are often dismayed when they receive a denial letter from an insurance company. Worse yet, many victims are even denied by their own insurance companiesafter years of dutifully paying their insurance premiums. If this is happening to you, or if you have suffered injuries in a motor vehicle crash, you should not put up with the unfair insurance tactics.

Trust the attorneys of Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC. With offices in New York, New Jersey, Alabama and Georgia, we have the resources and experience to tackle any size case. For those who have been hurt in accidents involving semi tractor-trailers and other large commercial vehicles, it is extremely important to understand the key differences between these large scale claims and your usual car accidents.

Severe Injuries

Perhaps the most notable distinction between a typical car wreck and a trucking accident is the extent of the injuries. Motor vehicle crashes in general have been increasing in frequency and are quickly approaching the top 10 leading causes of death among all Americans. As of 2015, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reported that they ranked 13th among all causes of death but ranked seventh among younger Americans.

Over 36,000 people die in motor vehicle crashes each year, of which approximately 4,000 are due to large truck accidents. In 2016, there were 3,986 people killed by large truck collisions, according to the Insurance Information Institute. While trucking collisions make up a small percentage of the total accidents that occur, they result in a disproportionate percentage of the fatal crashes. Therefore, there are rarely “minor” injuries in truck collisions.

Different Defendants

 A trucking accident will involve numerous potential defendants who may have conflicting interests in the case. In a typical two-car collision, both parties are regular people. They each may have a car insurance policy, they both have roughly the same resources and access to investigative tools. Both will contact their insurance companies, and they may each contact an attorney.

When a trucking company is involved, there may be numerous parties potentially responsible for causing the crash. These may include:

• Lumpers (people the driver hired to load the truck)
• Factories or warehouses where the truck was loaded improperly
• Mechanics who failed to properly fix defective equipment
• Truck or trailer manufacturers who incorrectly designed equipment
• The truck driver
• The trucking company
• Leasing company that supplied a truck or trailer

Complicated Evidence

 In addition to all the possible parties at fault in causing the crash, there may also be more complicated evidence. In a typical car accident, there is a crash report, maybe some witness statements and photographs, and perhaps some data from the car’s crash recorder. In a trucking case, there can be a lot more information available, and it can be difficult to obtain unless you know where to look.

• Electronic crash data recorder (black box)
• Log books
• GPS data
• Qualcomm data
• Cell phone records
• Maintenance logs
• Bills of lading and shipping records
• Witness statements

Likewise, federal motor carrier standards apply to most interstate hauling companies, so there are many cases in which a driver was in violation of the federal standards. These regulations can be a bit complicated unless you are familiar with them.

Fast Action Required

Finally, you cannot take your time investigating a truck accident. Trucking companies often immediately launch an investigation. There have been cases in which the company had investigators and engineers on site at the scene of the crash, already photographing damage, talking to police and witnesses, and trying to clean up debris. This is going on while you, as the injured person, are on your way to the hospital. Therefore, trucking companies already have a distinct advantage.

This is why it is important to work with skilled attorneys who can immediately begin investigating and working to preserve crucial evidence before it is destroyed or altered.

When to Call an Attorney

After a collision with a commercial vehicle, your first step should be to get emergency medical attention right away. Go straight to the hospital and let doctors evaluate your injuries. If you are able, contact a loved one and have them call an attorney right away. The attorney can begin quickly moving to gather evidence and preserve your rights. Once your injuries are stabilized, you will need to follow up on your medical care and do as your doctor recommends.

The earlier an attorney is involved, the better your chances of obtaining monetary compensation for your injuries. If you or a loved one have been hurt in a trucking accident, call Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC today. We offer private free consultations, and there is never any risk for calling because we do not get paid unless you do.

 

 

The post Understanding the Differences Between Car Accidents and Trucking Accidents appeared first on .

Caroline Hollingsworth Named “Rising Star in Law 2018” by the Birmingham Business Journal

HGD attorney Caroline Hollingsworth was named “Rising Star in Law 2018” by the Birmingham Business Journal. The fourth annual Birmingham’s Rising Star Lawyers Awards honor up-and-coming attorneys under the age of 40. Honorees were selected based on their contributions to the firm, tangible results in their practice areas and involvement in the community, among other factors.

Caroline attended the University of Alabama for her undergraduate studies and acquired a degree in political science and history. She later obtained a scholarship to William Bowen School of Law in Little Rock, Arkansas. She has been practicing in the area of Mass Torts at HGD for seven years. During her tenure at the firm, Caroline has been the head of the firm’s Vaginal Mesh Litigation helping close to 2,000 clients-helped facilitate settlements. She also worked on the Syngenta Corn Litigation-which is now in settlement.

Caroline and her husband, Jonathan, have two daughters and two dogs. They attend Hunter Street Baptist Church and serve on their neighborhood’s planning committee. In her spare time, Caroline also volunteers with the Junior League of Birmingham and enjoys running and watching college football.

 

The post Caroline Hollingsworth Named “Rising Star in Law 2018” by the Birmingham Business Journal appeared first on .

Congratulations to the Winners in HGD’s 2018 Closing Argument Competition “In Summation”!

Congratulations to the winners in HGD’s 4th Annual “In Summation” Closing Argument Competition: Cumberland’s Jordan Godwin wins 1st Place and $1000; BSL’s Tonya Howard-Mines wins 2nd Place and $750; and Daron Drew from BSL wins 3rd Place and $500. HGD holds this competition for local law school students to help promote advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills.

Held in the  Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room, the original field of competitors was narrowed down to a top six who paired off in the final rounds last night. The jury was comprised of HGD attorneys and staff, and HGD attorneys Drew Haskins and Chris Hood presided over the competition as the judges.

An official presentation of the winning prizes is forthcoming. HGD congratulates all the law students who competed the last two weeks.

The post Congratulations to the Winners in HGD’s 2018 Closing Argument Competition “In Summation”! appeared first on .

Congratulations to the 6 Finalists in HGD’s 2018 Closing Argument Competition!

Congratulations to the top 6 finalists in HGD’s 4th Annual Closing Argument Competition 2018, “In Summation.” The six finalists who will be competing for the top three spots this week are Christine Bussey, Taylor Dant, Daron Drew, Jordan Godwin, Dylan Scilabro, and Tonya Vines.

Heninger Garrison Davis takes great pride in this event and the learning opportunity it provides for students attending Cumberland School of Law and Birmingham School of Law. Our goal is to encourage advocacy and reward those law students for advancing their advocacy skills.

Each participant was given a trial problem and asked to present a closing argument before a mock jury that includes judges, lawyers and laypersons. The final round is Thursday, October 4 in the Stephen D. Heninger Moot Court Room in our downtown Birmingham office.

The prizes for the top three are: 

1^st Place will receive $1,000 & an engraved plaque

2^nd Place will receive a check for $750 & an engraved plaque

3^rd Place will receive a check for $500 & an engraved plaque

Good luck to all our finalists!

 

 

The post Congratulations to the 6 Finalists in HGD’s 2018 Closing Argument Competition! appeared first on .